Abstract

Background: During the functional rehabilitation program (FRP), the significant difference in the speed and pulse rate between two walking mechanisms (with and without a windlass mechanism) on two different terrains, randomized cross-over trial. Methods and materials: Twenty two students aged 18-22 years with normal physiques. Students in both groups were instructed to walk in bare foot with and without the windlass mechanism on floor and treadmill. The primary outcome was to increase the speed and decrease the time with the windlass mechanism in barefoot walking during the FRP. The secondary outcome was to reduce the effort by using the windlass mechanism in barefoot walking during the FRP. Findings: The average time to complete 50 meters on the floor with a windlass mechanism is 30.7 seconds with a standard deviation of 0.91 seconds, whereas the average time without a windlass mechanism is 38.4 seconds with a standard deviation of 1.39 seconds. This difference in the mean is statistically significant (p <0.001). After walking, the average post-radial pulse rate with and without mechanism was 120.3 bpm and 131.4 bpm, with standard deviations of 2.87 bpm and 1.09 bpm, respectively. This difference in the mean is statistically significant (p <0.001). The average speed achieved for 120 seconds (2 minutes) with the windlass mechanism is 0.095 m/s with a standard deviation of 0.008 m/s, whereas the average speed achieved without the windlass mechanism is 0.066 m/s with a standard deviation of 0.007 m/s. This difference in the mean is statistically significant (p <0.001). After walking, the average post-radial pulse rate with and without mechanism was 129.8 bpm and 135.1 bpm, with standard deviations of 2.33 bpm and 3.34 bpm, respectively. This difference in the mean is statistically significant (p <0.001). Interpretation: This study finds that there is an increase in speed with less effort (lesser pulse rate) while using a windlass mechanism on both terrains. This research study suggests that the windlass mechanism can be used during the FRP. BKL Walawalkar Hospital’s Ethics Committee (EC/NEW/INST/2020/320) approved this study.

• 1.   Van der Zee, T.J., Mundinger, E.M. & Kuo, A.D. A biomechanics dataset of healthy human walking at various speeds, step lengths and step widths. Sci Data 9, 704 (2022). https://doi. org/10.1038/s41597-022-01817-1.
• 2.   Carvalho C, Sunnerhagen KS, Willén C. Walking speed and distance in different environments of subjects in the later stage post-stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Nov;26(8):519 27. doi: 10.3109/09593980903585042. Epub 2010 Jul 22. PMID: 20649494.
• 3.   Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/ japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2. PMID: 24812254; PMCID: PMC4254896.
• 4.   Sharma M, Tadimalla R S, 2022, Walking Barefoot: 6 Health Benefits and Risks, https:// www.stylecraze.com (Accessed on 15/10/22).
• 5.   Can you walk on a Treadmill Barefoot? (Safety and Best Practice) https://condition and nutrition. com (Accessed on 15/10/22).
• 6.   Patel, H., & Anandh, S. (2019). Effect of Barefoot Functional Rehabilitation in Flat Foot among Obese Women. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development.
• 7.   Reeves ND, Bowling FL. Conservative biomechanical strategies for knee osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;7(2):113-22. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.212. PMID: 21289615.
• 8.   Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 Jan 23, https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov (Accessed on 15/10/22).
• 9.   Volpe D, Spolaor F, Sawacha Z, Guiotto A, Pavan D, Bakdounes L, Urbani V, Frazzitta G, Iansek R. Muscular activation changes in lower limbs after under water gait training in Parkinson's disease: A surface emg pilot study. Gait Posture. 2020 Jul;80:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j. gaitpost.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 11. PMID: 32526615.
• 10.   Hollander K, Petersen E, Zech A, Hamacher D. Effects of barefoot vs. shod walking during indoor and outdoor conditions in younger and older adults. Gait Posture. 2022 Jun;95:284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 Apr 15. PMID: 34020852.
• 11.   https://www.physio-pedia.com/windlass Test (Accessed on 15/10/22).
• 12.   Peggy A Houghlum, Odores B. Berlati. Brunnstrom’s clinical kinesiology. 6th edition, Ankle and Foot.521.
• 13.   Sichting F, Ebrecht F. The rise of the longitudinal arch when sitting, standing, and walking: Contributions of the windlass mechanism. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249965. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0249965.PMID: 33831112; PMCID: PMC8031382.
• 14.   Welte L, Kelly LA, Kessler SE, Lieberman DE, D'Andrea SE, Lichtwark GA, Rainbow MJ. The extensibility of the plantar fascia influences the windlass mechanism during human running. Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 27;288(1943):20202095. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2095. Epub 2021 Jan 20. PMID: 33468002; PMCID: PMC7893268.
• 15.   Welte L, Kelly LA, Lichtwark GA, Rainbow MJ. Influence of the windlass mechanism on arch-spring mechanics during dynamic foot arch deformation. J R Soc Interface. 2018 Aug;15(145):20180270. doi: 10.1098/ rsif.2018.0270. PMID: 30111662; PMCID: PMC6127178.
• 16.   Williams LR, Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Arch ES, Bruening DA. The influence of the windlass mechanism on kinematic and kinetic foot joint coupling. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Feb 16;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00520-z. PMID: 35172865; PMCID: PMC8848977.
• 17.   Chan CW, Rudins A. Foot biomechanics during walking and running. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 May;69(5):448-61. doi: 10.1016/s0025 6196(12)61642-5. PMID: 8170197.
• 18.   Nüesch C, Overberg JA, Schwameder H, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A. Repeatability of spatiotemporal, plantar pressure and force parameters during treadmill walking and running. Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 7. PMID: 29547791.
• 19.   MejiaCruz Y, Franco J, Hainline G, Fritz S, Jiang Z, Caicedo JM, Davis B, Hirth V. Walking speed measurement technology: A review. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2021 Mar;10(1):32-41. doi: 10.1007/s13670-020-00349-z. Epub 2021 Jan 20. PMID: 33816062; PMCID: PMC8014958.
• 20.   Rose DK, Nadeau SE, Wu SS, Tilson JK, Dobkin BH, Pei Q, Duncan PW. Locomotor Training and Strength and Balance Exercises for Walking Recovery After Stroke: Response to Number of Training Sessions. Phys Ther. 2017 Nov 1;97(11):1066-1074. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx079. PMID: 29077960; PMCID: PMC6075074.
• 21.   Leppä H, Karavirta L, Rantalainen T, Rantakokko M, Siltanen S, Portegijs E, Rantanen T. Use of walking modifications, perceived walking difficulty and changes in outdoor mobility among community-dwelling older people during COVID-19 restrictions. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Oct;33(10):2909-2916. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01956-2. Epub 2021 Aug 20. PMID: 34417731; PMCID: PMC8378291.
• 22.   Nascimento LR, Rocha RJ, Boening A, Ferreira GP, Perovano MC. Home-based exercises are as effective as equivalent doses of centre based exercises for improving walking speed and balance after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2022 Jul;68(3):174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 Jun 23. PMID: 35753966.
• 23.   Caravaggi P, Pataky T, Goulermas JY, Savage R, Crompton R. A dynamic model of the windlass mechanism of the foot: evidence for early stance phase preloading of the plantar aponeurosis. J Exp Biol. 2009 Aug;212(Pt 15):2491-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.025767. PMID: 19617443.
• 24.   Manfredi-Márquez MJ, Tovaruela-Carrión N, Távara-Vidalón P, Domínguez-Maldonado G, Fernández-Seguín LM, Ramos-Ortega J. Three-dimensional variations in the lower limb caused by the windlass mechanism. PeerJ. 2017 Dec 18;5:e4103. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4103. PMID: 29302385; PMCID: PMC5738965.
• 25.   Song S, LaMontagna C, Collins SH, Geyer H. The effect of foot compliance encoded in the windlass mechanism on the energetics of human walking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3179-82. doi: 10.1109/ EMBC.2013.6610216. PMID: 24110403.
• 26.   Kappel-Bargas A, Woolf RD, Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. The windlass mechanism during normal walking and passive first metatarsalphalangeal joint extension. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998 Apr;13(3):190 194. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(97)00038-7. PMID: 11415787.
• 27.   Gelber JR, Sinacore DR, Strube MJ, Mueller MJ, Johnson JE, Prior FW, Hastings MK. Windlass Mechanism in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Neuropathy, and Low Medial Longitudinal Arch Height. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Aug;35(8):816-824. doi: 10.1177/1071100714538416. Epub 2014 Jun 10. PMID: 24917647; PMCID: PMC4262736.
• 28.   Fuller EA. The windlass mechanism of the foot. A mechanical model to explain pathology. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000 Jan;90(1):35-46. doi: 10.7547/87507315-90-1-35. PMID: 10659531.
• 29.   Lin SC, Chen CP, Tang SF, Wong AM, Hsieh JH, Chen WP. Changes in windlass effect in response to different shoe and insole designs during walking. Gait Posture. 2013 Feb;37(2):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 9. PMID: 22884544.
• 30.   Lucas R, Cornwall M. Influence of foot posture on the functioning of the windlass mechanism. Foot (Edinb). 2017 Mar;30:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j. foot. 2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 17. PMID: 28259028.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding