Home > Journals > Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Submit your article Read this Journals View all journals
Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Sreenivas Reddy M , Sreenivas Reddy M. , K Udaya Bhaskar , Mamatha Paturu , KV Srinivasan

Author Information

Licence:



Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 7(2):p 562-569, Mar-Apr 2020. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.18

How Cite This Article:

 

Sreenivas Reddy M, K Udaya Bhaskar, Mamatha Paturu, et al. A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and
Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(2):562–569.

Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is preferable to general anesthesia in upper limb surgeries. Various adjuvants have been added to improve the quality of the block and prolong postoperative analgesia. Alpha-2 agonists are used as adjuants to local anesthetics to extend the duration of neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. We compared clonidine and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Aims: To compare the effects of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine when added as adjuvant to Bupivacaine on onset and duration of sensory & motor block, duration of analgesia and quality of block for Supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded study 60 ASA I–II patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each. First group received 30 ml bupivacaine 0.325% with Clonidine 1 mcg/kg (Group C) and second group received 30 ml bupivacaine 0.325% with dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg (Group D) in Supraclavicular brachial plexus. The characteristics for anesthesia and analgesia were assessed for the two groups. Results: Onset of sensory block was faster
in Group D than in Group C, while onset of motor block was faster in Group C than in Group D, but the difference was not statistically significant. Duration of sensory block and motor block was 234.17 ± 24.11 min and 296.30 ± 25.78 min in Group C as compared with 445.07 ± 67.79 min and 503.10 ± 75.67 min in Group D. Statistically significant longer duration of sensory and motor block was observed in Group D (p < 0.001). There was significant increase in duration of analgesia in Group D (477.27 ± 70.11 min) as compared with Group C (285.43 ± 26.88 min). In Group D, 83.3% of the patients achieved Grade IV quality of block as opposed to 43.3% in Group C (p = 0.006). Conclusion: To conclude, dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and enhances the quality of block as compared with clonidine when used as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine. The added advantage of conscious sedation, hemodynamic stability, and minimal side-effects makes it a potential adjuvant for nerve blocks.

References

No records found.


About this article

Cite this article

 

Sreenivas Reddy M, K Udaya Bhaskar, Mamatha Paturu, et al. A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and
Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(2):562–569.

Licence:



Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.18

Keywords

Bupivacaine; Clonidine; Dexmedetomidine; Supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 14 July 2026, 08:19:29 (IST)

5689

Accesses

3
679
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords

Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline

Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence




Access this article

Reprint Order Form
Buy this Article
Institutional Subscriptions

Share