Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Comparative Study Between Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Open Hemorrhoidectomy

Udesh Rajpurohit, Dharamveer Jajra, Shaheen Akbar, Manohar L. Dawan, Sunder Kishore, Diwan Singh Jakhar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


New Indian Journal of Surgery 17(2):p 59-63, April-June 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.17226.3

How Cite This Article:

Udesh Rajpurohit, Dharamveer Jajra, Shaheen Akbar, et al. A Comparative Study Between Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Open Hemorrhoidectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2025; 17(2): 59-63.

Timeline

Received : April 24, 2026         Accepted : June 03, 2026          Published : June 30, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhoids are a common benign anorectal disorder that significantly impacts quality of life. While open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) is considered the gold standard for advanced hemorrhoids, it is associated with severe postoperative pain and prolonged recovery. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive alternative that ablates hemorrhoidal tissue with laser energy, aiming to reduce morbidity. Aim: To compare the outcomes of LHP and OH in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications, and recurrence. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted over 12 months in the Department of Surgery. Patients with Grade ll-III–IV hemorrhoids were randomized into two groups: Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Group (LHPG, n=30) and Open Hemorrhoidectomy Group (OHG, n=30). Data on operative time, pain (VAS score), hospital stay, complications, and recurrence were collected and analyzed using SPSS v26. Results: LHP demonstrated shorter operative time (25.6 ± 3.8 min vs. 38.7 ± 5.2 min), lower VAS pain scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours, and reduced hospital stay. Complication rates were lower in LHPG, with reduced bleeding and constipation compared to OHG. Recurrence rates at 3 months were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Laser hemorrhoidoplasty is a safe, minimally invasive alternative to open hemorrhoidectomy, offering significant advantages in terms of pain reduction, faster recovery, and fewer complications, though cost and availability remain limiting factors.


References

  • 1.   Sun Z., Migaly J. Review of hemorrhoid disease: presentation and management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016; 29(1): 22-29.
  • 2.   Riss S., Weiser F.A., Schwameis K., Riss T., Mittlböck M., Stift A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27(2): 215-220.
  • 3.   Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(17): 2009-2017.
  • 4.   Alonso-Coello P., Guyatt G., Heels-Ansdell D., Johanson J.F., Lopez-Yarto M., Mills E., Zhou Q., Johanson N.A. Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (4): CD004649.
  • 5.   Johannsson H.O., Graf W., Påhlman L. Longterm results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg. 2002; 168(9): 485-489.
  • 6.   Milligan E.T.C., Morgan C.N., Jones L.E., Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937; 230(5959): 1119-1124.
  • 7.   Ferguson J.A., Heaton J.R. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959; 2(2): 176-179.
  • 8.   Ho Y.H., Seow-Choen F., Goh H.S. Randomized trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 1997; 84(12): 1729-1730.
  • 9.   Iyer V.S., Shrier I., Gordon P.H. Longterm outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47(8): 1364-1370.
  • 10.   Plapler H., Hage R., Duarte J., Cury J., Silva A., Silva C. Early results of the first Brazilian experience with laser for hemorrhoid treatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 24(5): 729-733.
  • 11.   Giamundo P. Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8(1): 1-4.
  • 12.   Maloku H., Gashi Z., Lazovic R., JunikuShkololli A. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Med Arch. 2014; 68(5): 350-353.
  • 13.   Gupta P.J. Infrared coagulation versus rubber band ligation in early hemorrhoids. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003; 36(10): 1433-1439.
  • 14.   Bittorf B., Stadelmaier U., Bittorf M., Hohenberger W., Matzel K.E. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a critical appraisal of the current options. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004; 389(1): 1-9.
  • 15.   Salfi R. Hemorrhoidectomy vs. minimally invasive techniques: A prospective, randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12(6): e120–e125.
  • 16.   De Nardi P., Capretti G., Corsaro A., Staudacher C. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and laser hemorrhoidoplasty: long-term results and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20(7): 443-449.
  • 17.   El Nakeeb A., Fikry A., Omar W., Fouda E., Youssef T. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy vs stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs laser hemorrhoidoplasty: randomized study. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(8): 670-675.
  • 18.   Giamundo P., Braini A., Calabrò G., Mistrangelo M., Mongardini M. The use of laser in hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23(9): 743-751.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Udesh Rajpurohit, Dharamveer Jajra, Shaheen Akbar, et al. A Comparative Study Between Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Open Hemorrhoidectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2025; 17(2): 59-63.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
April 24, 2026 June 03, 2026 June 30, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.17226.3

Keywords

HemorrhoidsLaser HemorrhoidoplastyOpen HemorrhoidectomyMinimally Invasive SurgeryPostoperative Pain

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 28 July 2026, 16:10:21 (IST)


3308

Accesses

20
294
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received April 24, 2026
Accepted June 03, 2026
Published June 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share