Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

To Compare the Anti-emetic Efficacy, Duration of Action, and Side Effects of Palonosetron, Ondansetron, and Granisetron for Anti-emetic Prophylaxis of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries

Shweta Naik , Aishwarya Bandewar1 , Shweta Naik2 , Manish Kokne3

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 6(5):p 1497-1505, September-October 2019. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6519.1

How Cite This Article:

Aishwarya Bandewar, Shweta Naik, Manish Kokne. To Compare the Anti-emetic Efficacy, Duration of Action, and Side Effects of Palonosetron, Ondansetron, and Granisetron for Anti-emetic Prophylaxis of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(5 Part-1):1497-1504.


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the anti-emetic efficacy, duration of action, and side effects of Palonosetron, Ondansetron, and Granisetron for anti-emetic prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Methodology: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind study on patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. The total 120 patients were divided into three groups of 40 patients. Patients of group A were given injection palonosetron (0.075 mg), group B were given injection ondansetron (4 mg), and group C were given injection granisetron (1 mg), intravenously along with premedication, fifteen minutes prior to induction of general anaesthesia. We analyzed the anti-emetic efficacy, duration of action, and side effects of palonosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron. Results: Total incidence of nausea and vomiting was maximum in ondansetron group with total of 74 compared to 36 in granisetron and 12 in palonosetron group, considering overalapping data in all time intervals and this difference was found to be statistically major. In ondansetron group 18 patients had complete response, while complete response was higher in granisetron group (24) and highest with 28 patients in palonosetron group and this difference was statistically substantial. (p < 0.05). Headache and sedation was found in ondansetron group in 2 and 4 patients respectively while only 1 patient had headache in palonosetron group, 7 patients complained of headache in granisetron group. Conclusion: We conclude that palonosetron is more effective in comparison to granisetron and ondansetron in the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing elective abdominal laproscopic surgeries.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

Aishwarya Bandewar, Shweta Naik, Manish Kokne. To Compare the Anti-emetic Efficacy, Duration of Action, and Side Effects of Palonosetron, Ondansetron, and Granisetron for Anti-emetic Prophylaxis of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(5 Part-1):1497-1504.


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6519.1

Keywords

Ondansetron; Granisetron and palonosetron‘ anti-emetic prophylaxis.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 12:53:58 (IST)


5653

Accesses

5
678
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share