Abstract

This review article posits that the contemporary crises of environmental degradation and social anomie are rooted in a pervasive anthropocentric worldview. It argues that the philosophy of Deep Ecology, pioneered by Arne Naess, offers not merely a policy adjustment but a fundamental reorientation of human consciousness and identity from a narrow, egoic self (the ‘ego-self’) to a expansive, ecological self (the ‘Ecological Self’). This shift is presented as the critical fulcrum upon which a genuinely sustainable and welfare-oriented human destiny hinges. The article systematically reviews the core principles of Deep Ecology, contrasting them with dominant ‘shallow’ environmentalism and exploring their implications for social welfare paradigms. It engages with existing literature to situate Deep Ecology within broader ecological and philosophical discourses. A unique personal statement articulates the argument for Deep Ecology as an essential, yet often overlooked, dimension of sustainability. Furthermore, the article draws parallels between the principles of Deep Ecology and the ancient wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita, suggesting that its teachings on non-attachment, duty, and the unity of all existence provide a timeless template for the lifestyle practices necessary to embody the Ecological Self. The conclusion asserts that the realization of human destiny is inextricably linked to the recognition of our intrinsic belonging to the ecosphere, necessitating a transformation in management, welfare, and personal conduct. The article concludes by outlining a scope for further research into the practical application of these principles in socio-economic systems.

• 1.   Bookchin M. The modernity of ecology. In: Bookchin M, editor. The philosophy of social ecology: essays on dialectical naturalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books; 1987. p. 77–92.
• 2.   Daily GC, editor. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press; 1997.
• 3.   Devall B, Sessions G. Deep ecology: living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City: Gibbs Smith; 1985.
• 4.   Fox W. Toward a transpersonal ecology: developing new foundations for environmentalism. Boston: Shambhala Publications; 1990.
• 5.   Hamilton C. Defiant earth: the fate of humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017.
• 6.   Leopold A. A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press; 1949.
• 7.   Lovelock JE. Gaia: a new look at life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.
• 8.   Max-Neef M. Human scale development: conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press; 1991.
• 9.   Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books; 1972.
• 10.   Naess A. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry. 1973;16(1-4):95–100.
• 11.   Naess A. Ecology, community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy. Rothenberg D, translator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
• 12.   Naess A, Sessions G. Basic principles of deep ecology. Ecophilosophy. 1984;6:3–7.
• 13.   Plumwood V. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge; 1993.
• 14.   Prabhupada ACB. Bhagavad-gita as it is. Los Angeles: The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust; 1972.
• 15.   Skolimowski H. Eco-philosophy: designing new tactics for living. Boston: Marion Boyars; 1981.
• 16.   Watts A. The book on the taboo against knowing who you are. New York: Pantheon Books; 1966.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding