Abstract

Prosthodontics, the dental specialty focused on creating artificial replacements for teeth and oral structures, is governed by a complex medicolegal framework essential for ensuring patient safety and professional integrity. In prosthodontics, medicolegal aspects primarily deal with ensuring the standard of care, maintaining patient rights and avoiding malpractice. This review highlights key medicolegal aspects, including informed consent, negligence, and the ethical responsibilities of prosthodontists. It shows the importance of thorough documentation, effective communication, ethical issues and adherence to standards of care to mitigate malpractice risks.
 

• 1.   Sykes, D. (2000). 8. Medico-legal aspect of dental implants.. Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons
• 2.   Cruz L. Legal aspects of general dental practice. Churchill Livingstone; 2006
• 3.   Sachin, John., Rohit, Raghavan., Shajahan, P, A. (2022). 1. The decisive role of prosthodontics and its invaluable contribution to forensic odontology: A review. IP Annals of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry, doi: 10.18231/j.aprd.2022.028
• 4.   Medha, Sansanwal., Deepshikha, Sansanwal., Shaifaly, Chouhan. (2020). 3. Medico legal perspective in dentistry. doi: 10.18231/J.IDJSR.2020.018
• 5.   Paul G. Medical Law for dental surgeon. Jaypee Digit. 2004;(5):29
• 6.   Booth S. A philosophical analysis of informed consent. Nurs Stand. 2002 Jun 12-18; 16(39): 43-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.39.43.c3211
• 7.   Goel K, Goel P, Goel S. Negligence and its legal implications for dental professionals: a review. TMU J. 2014;1(3):113–8.
• 8.   Worthington, P. (1995). Medicolegal aspects of oral implant surgery
• 9.   Upendra, Singh, Bhadauria., Pralhad, L, Dasar., N, Sandesh., Prashant, Mishra., Shaijal, Godha. (2018). 4. Medico-legal Aspect of Dental Practice. doi: 10.15386/CJMED-764
• 10.   Mohammad, Zakaria, Nassani. (2017). 5. Aspects of Malpractice in Prosthodontics.. Journal of Prosthodontics, doi: 10.1111/JOPR.12636
• 11.   Manas, Gupta., Kirti, Shrivastava., Sunil, Kumar, Mishra., Ravish, Ahuja., Pankaj, Mishra., Shail, Kumari. (2018). 6. Importance and awareness of medico legal issues in dental practice… Alarm call. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, doi: 10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_317_17
• 12.   P, Ghimire., Pramita, Suwal., Bishal, Babu, Basnet. (2022). 7. Management of Medically Compromised Prosthodontic Patients. International Journal of Dentistry, doi: 10.1155/2022/7510578
• 13.   Sahoo PK, Priyadarshini SR, Sahoo KK. Dental negligence during prosthetic treatment. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4)
• 14.   Mário, Marques, Fernandes., Rachel, Lima, Ribeiro, Tinoco., Talita, Lima, de, Castro., Luiz, Renato, Paranhos., Luiz, Francesquini, Júnior., Eduardo, Daruge, Júnior. (2014). 9. Failures in dental prosthesis: dentists perception of the involved legal aspects. Acta Scientiarum. Health Science, doi: 10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V36I1.16851
• 15.   Markose A, Krishnan R, Ramesh M. Medical ethics. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016 Oct;8(Suppl 1):S1-S4. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.191934. PMID:27829735; PMCID: PMC5074007.
• 16.   Lopez-Nicolas M, Falcon M, Perez-Carceles MD, et al: Informed ´ consent in dental malpractice claims. A retrospective study. Int Dent J 2007;57:168-172
• 17.   Kelleher M: Ethical issues, dilemmas and controversies in ‘cosmetic’ or aesthetic dentistry. A personal opinion. Br Dent J 2012;212:365-367
• 18.   Bowley J: Minimal intervention prosthodontics: current knowledge and societal implications. Med Princ Pract 2002;11(Suppl 1):22-31
• 19.   Lynch CD, Allen PF: Quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:901-905
• 20.   Rene N, Owall B: Malpractice reports in prosthodontics in ´ Sweden. Sweden Dent J 1991;15:205-217
• 21.   Carlsson GE, Omar R: Trends in prosthodontics. Med Princ Pract 2006;15:167-179
• 22.   Gosavi S, Gosavi S. Forensic odontology: A Prosthodontic view. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4:38–41. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.99162
• 23.   MacEntee MI, Campbell T. Personal identification using dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:377–80. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90032-5.
• 25.   Acharya AB, Anehosur GV, Kanchi PP, Naik MG, Nadiger RK. Perceptions and preferences on denture marking in an Indian sample. Gerodontology. 2012;29:117–24.
• 26.   Afsin H, Karadayi B, Cagdir SA, Ozaslan A. Role of bite mark characteristics and localizations in finding an assailant. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014 Sep;6(3):202-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.137078. PMID: 25177145; PMCID: PMC4142413.
• 28.   Nidhi, Yadav., P., C., Srivastava. (2014). 3. Bite Marks: An Indispensible Forensic Odontological Evidence in Rape Cases. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine,
• 29.   Preetam, Shah., Priyam, Rajesh, Velani., Laxmi, Lakade., Siya, Dukle. (2019). 1. Teeth in forensics: A review. Indian Journal of Dental Research, doi:10.4103/IJDR.IJDR_9_17
• 30.   Rakhee, Modak., Sandhya, Tamgadge., Amit, Mhapuskar., Manjula, Hebbale., N, Vasantha, Vijayarabhavan. (2016). 4. Bite mark analysis: Chasing the bite!. Journal of Oral Health Research, doi: 10.4103/2393-8692.196091
• 31.   https://legalonus.com/section-106-of-thebharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-bns-definition-ofmedical-negligence/#google_vignette

Data Sharing Statement

Funding