Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Luteal Phase Defects: Review

Aakruti Ganla,, Alka Bhaurao Patil, Sanskruti Rathod, Harshali Rajiv Tuknait

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 12(1):p 13-14, Jan-June 2025. | DOI: 10.21088/ijmfnm.2455.8621.12125.2

How Cite This Article:

Patil AB, Ganla AA, Rathod S, et al. Luteal Phase Defects: Review. Indian J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025;12(1):13-16.

Timeline

Received : February 06, 2025         Accepted : March 06, 2025          Published : June 30, 2025

Abstract

Luteal Phase Defects (LPD), also known as Corpus Luteum Insufficiency or Luteal Phase Insufficiency, are characterized by insufficient function of the corpus luteum, resulting in inadequate progesterone secretion. This can lead to a shortened luteal phase and poor endometrial secretion, which are critical for embryo implantation and pregnancy maintenance. During the menstrual cycle, women with LPD still experience normal follicular development and ovulation. However, due to early degeneration of the corpus luteum or insufficient progesterone, the luteal phase becomes dysfunctional. This can hinder the thickening of the endometrium, which is necessary for a fertilized egg to implant. Luteal Phase Defects are a common cause of female endocrine dysfunctions, impacting fertility and pregnancy outcomes. With advancements in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), LPD has become more prevalent, particularly among ART patients. The condition is often addressed through progesterone supplementation or other fertility treatments to improve the luteal phase function and enhance chances of conception. Management of LPD typically includes hormone therapy to correct progesterone deficiency and optimize the uterine environment for implantation.


References

  • 1.   Mala Arora - Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Luteal Phase Defects, 122-126; Jaypee Brothers, 2003
  • 2.   Shi L, Cui L, Yang L, He L, Jia L, Bai W, Wang L, Xu W. Hotspots and frontiers in luteal phase defect research: An in-depth global trend bibliometric and visualization analysis over a 52-year period. Heliyon. 2024 July 25;10(15)
  • 3.   Tavaniotou A, Albano C, Smitz J, Devroey P. Impact of ovarian stimulation on corpus luteum function and embryonic implantation. J Reprod Immunol. 2002 May-Jun;55(1-2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(01)00134-6. PMID: 12062827.
  • 4.   Strott CA, Cargille CM, Ross GT, Lipsett MB. The short luteal phase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1970:30:246.
  • 5.   Daya S. Habitual Abortion in the textbook of Gynaecology, Copeland LJ (Ed): WB Saunders and company 2000;227-57.
  • 6.   Batista MC, Cartledge TP, Merino M J et al. Midluteal phase endometrial biopsy does not accurately predict luteal function Fertil Steril 1993;59;294-300.
  • 7.   Sharma M, Balasundaram P. Ovulation Induction Techniques. [Updated 2023 StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan.
  • 8.   Duru Shah; Luteal Phase Defect and Early pregnancy wastage, Reproductive Endocrinology, Jaypee brothers, Chapter 19, 2nd edition, 2001
  • 9.   Sheehan KL, KL. Casper R RF, Yen SSC: Luteal Phase Defects Induced by an Agonist of Luteinising Hormone Releasing Factor: A Model for Fertility Control. Science 215:170- 72;1982.
  • 10.   KupesićS,KurjakA,VujisićS,PetrovićZ.Luteal phase defect: comparison between Doppler velocimetry, histological and hormonal markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;9(2):105-12.
  • 11.   Ginsburg KA. Luteal phase defect. Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992 Mar;21(1):85-104.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interests.


About this article


Cite this article

Patil AB, Ganla AA, Rathod S, et al. Luteal Phase Defects: Review. Indian J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025;12(1):13-16.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
February 06, 2025 March 06, 2025 June 30, 2025

DOI: 10.21088/ijmfnm.2455.8621.12125.2

Keywords

Corpus LuteumProgesteroneImplantationUterusFertility

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 18 June 2026, 02:34:23 (IST)


553

Accesses

7
95
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 06, 2025
Accepted March 06, 2025
Published June 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share