Ravi Kumar Chittoria Professor & Registrar, Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India
Raghuveer Choudhury Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India
Barath Kumar Singh. P Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India
Address for correspondence: Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Professor & Registrar, Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India E-mail: drchittoria@yahoo.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator
RFP Journal of Dermatology
8(1):p 9-12, January – June 2023. | DOI: N\A
How Cite This Article:
Choudhury R, Chittoria RK, et al. Innovative Preservation of Skin Graft on the Donor Site. RFP J Dermatol. 2023;8(1):9–12.
Timeline
Received : December 05, 2022
Accepted : January 26, 2023
Published : June 30, 2023
Abstract
Skin grafting is a most common procedure done in plastic surgery department. The most common complication associated with skin grafting is graft loss. Graft loss is expected usually from day 7 - day 10. The excess skin graft harvested during the initial skin grafting will be preserved for the future graft loss. Various preservative methods are available for storage of excess skin grafts. In this article, we assess the preservation of skin grafts in the donor site of the same patient.
2. Hurst LN, Brown DH, Murray KA. Prolonged life and improved quality for stored skin grafts. PlastReconstrSurg 1984; 73: 105-110.
3. Fahmy FS, Navsaria HA, Frame JD, Jones CR, Leigh IM. Skin graft storage and keratinocyte viability. Br J PlastSurg 1993; 46:292 5.
4. Smith JW, Aston SJ (eds). Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery. 4th Edn. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1991.
5. Titley OG, Cooper M, Thomas A, Hancock K. Stored skin stored trouble? Br J PlastSurg 1994; 47: 24-29.
6. Greenleaf G, Hansbrough JF. Current trends inthe use of allograft skin for patients with burn andreflections on the future of skin banking in the United States. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994; 15(5):428–431.
7. Pollock GD. Cases of skin grafting and skintransplantation. Trans ClinSocLond. 1871; 4:37.
8. Girdner JH. Skin grafting with grafts taken from thedead subject. Med Rec. 1881; 20:119-120.
9. Zaroff LI, Mills W, Duckett JW, Switzer WE,Moncrief JA. Multiple uses of viable cutaneoushomografts in the burned patient. Surgery. 1966; 59(3):368-372.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available
Funding
This research received no funding
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval
Acknowledgements
Information Not Provided
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhury R, Chittoria RK, et al. Innovative Preservation of Skin Graft on the Donor Site. RFP J Dermatol. 2023;8(1):9–12.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator