Sanya Sharma M.Sc. Student, Department of Forensic Science, Amity University of Forensic Science, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201313, India
Prasansha Singla M.Sc. Student, Department of Forensic Science, Amity University of Forensic Science, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201313, India
Address for correspondence: Sanya Sharma, M.Sc. Student, Department of Forensic Science, Amity University of Forensic Science, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201313, India E-mail: Prasanshamittal@gamil.com
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
Received : June 25, 2022
Accepted : July 28, 2022
Published : December 25, 2022
Abstract
Wildlife crime, defined as the illegal capture, disturbance, ownership, exchange, or movement of animals and/or their derivatives, is a rising international problem that poses a threat to many species' survival. The ‘crime scene' in such investigations can range from an animal carcass to terrain with topography as diverse as woodland or desert, as
well as a variety of natural and man-made structures. The location of a wildlife crime scene is frequently remote, with insufficient facilities for thorough investigation and evidence collecting. These characteristics may pose particular issues in poorer sections of the world and countries suffering societal turmoil. Working at a wildlife crime scene necessitates the use of tools, investigation procedures, and scientific technologies that are all suited for the situation and the best available. A combination of portable and easy-to-use laboratory equipment, as well as current data gathering and information transmission systems, is likely to be required for effective inquiry in the field. It is critical to use an interdisciplinary approach. These tactics can be used to combat wildlife crimes and punish those involved in the illegal trafficking of animals, flora, and fauna, as well as their products. Footprint analysis, morphological and anatomical studies, microscopic inspections of bodily components, and molecular biology techniques such as serological, mitochondrial DNA, rRNA, and protein analysis are among these techniques. The well-documented methodology and techniques, as well as their disadvantages and advantages, have been thoroughly examined in this review, and will undoubtedly aid the court of law and scientists working in this field to reduce wildlife crime rates through scientific investigations.
References
1. Lawton MPC, Cooper JE (2009) Wildlife crime scene visits. ApplHerpetol 6: 29-45.
2. Mayer WV (1952) The hair of Californian mammals with keys to dorsal guard hairs of Californian mammals Am Midland Nat 48: 480-512.
3. Sreepada RA, Desai UM, Naik S (2002) The plight of Indian sea horses: need for conservation and management. Indian Academy Sci 82: 377-8.
4. Farnsworth NR, Soejarto DD (1991) Global importance of medicinal plants. Cons med plants 25-51.
5. Vincent AC, Foster SJ, Koldewey HJ (2011) Conservation and management of seahorses and other Syngnathidae. J Fish Biol 78 1681-724.
6. Bell B, Machin S (2011) The impact of migration on crime and victimisation. London: UK.
7. Wong KL, Wang J, But PPH, Shaw PC (2004) Application of cytochrome b DNA sequences for the authentication of endangered snake species. Forensic sci Int 139: 49-55.
8. Chapman DD, Abercrombie DL, Douady CJ, Pikitch EK, Stanhopen MJ, et al. (2003) A streamlined, bi-organelle, multiplex PCR approach to species identifica¬tion: application to global conservation and trade monitoring of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Cons Gen 4: 415-25.
9. Moore SE, Grebmeier JM, Davies JR (2003) Gray whale distribution relative to forage habitat in the northern Bering Sea: current conditions and retrospective summary. Canadian J Zoology 81: 734-42.
10. Branicki W, Kupiec T, Pawlowski R (2003) Validation of cytochrome b sequence analysis as a method of species identification. J Forensic Sci 48: 83-7.
11. Del-Prado R, Cubas P, Lumbsch HT, Divakar PK, Blanco O, et al. (2010) Genetic distances within and among species in monophyletic lineages of Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota) as a tool for taxon delimitation. Mol PhylsEvol 56: 125-33.
12. Wasser SP (2007) Molecular identification of species of the genus Agaricus. Why should we look at morphology? Int J Med Mushrooms 9: 85-8.
13. Hsieh HM, Huang LH, Tsai LC, Kuo YC, Meng HH, et al. (2003) Species identification of rhinoceros horns using the cytochrome b gene. Forensic Sci Int 136: 1-11.
14. Lo TW, Pickle CS, Lin S, Ralston EJ, Gurling M, et al. (2013) Precise and heritable genome editing in evolutionarily diverse nematodes using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 to engineer insertions and deletions. Genetics 195: 331-48.
15. Thakur M, Singh SK, Shukla M, Sharma LK, Mohan N (2013) Identification of Galliformes through Forensically Informative Nucleotide Sequencing (FINS) and its Implication in Wildlife Forensics. J Forensic Res 4: 195.
16. Espinosa EO, Mann MJ (1993) The History and Significance of the Schreger Pattern in Proboscidean Ivory Characterization; The American Institute for Con¬servation of Historic & Artistic Works 32: 241.
17. Singh RR, Goyal SP, Khanna PP, Mukherjee PK, Sukumar R (2006) Using morphometric and analytical techniques to characterize elephant ivory. Forensic Sci Int 162: 144-51.
18. Linacre A, Tobe SS (2011) An overview of the investigative approach to species testing in wildlife forensic science. Investig Genet 2: 2.
19. Dahiya MS, Yadav SK (2013) Scanning electron microscopic characterization and elemental analysis of hair: a tool in identification of felidae animals. J Forensic Res 4: 1.
20. Hausman LA (1930) Recent studies of hair structure relationships. Science Monthly 30: 258-77.
21. Cole HI (1924) Taxonomic value of hair in Chiroptera. Philippine J Sci 14: 117-21.
22. Williams CS (1938) Aids to the Identification of Mole and Shrew Hairs with General Comments on Hair Structure and Hair Determination. J Wildlife Man 2: 239-50.
23. Brown FM (1942) The Microscopy of Mammalian Hair for Anthropologists. Proc American Philos Soc 85: 250-74.
24. Martiniaková M, Grosskopf B, Omelka R, Vondráková M, Bauerová M (2006) Differences among species in compact bone tissue microstructure of mammalian skeleton: use of a discriminant function analysis for species identification. J Forensic Sci 51: 1235-9.
25. Hollmann T, Byard RW, Tsokos M (2008) The processing of skeletonized human remains found in Berlin, Germany. J Forensic Leg Med 15: 420-5.
26. Hillier ML, Bell LS (2007) Differentiating human bone from animal bone: a review of histological methods. J Forensic Sci 52: 249-63.
27. Ubelaker DH (2009) The forensic evaluation of burned skeletal remains: a synthesis. Forensic Sci Int 183: 1-5.
28. Cuijpers AGFM (2006) Histological identification of bone fragments in archaeology: telling humans apart from horses and cattle. Int J Osteoarchaeol 16: 465- 80.
29. Kuo HW, Kuo SM, Chou CH, Lee TC (2000) Determination of 14 elements in Taiwanese bones. Sci Total Environ 255: 45-54.
30. Kakuschke A, Griesel S, Fonfara S, Rosenberger T, Prange A (2008) Concentrations of Selected Essential and Non-Essential Elements in Blood of Harbor Seal (PhocaVitulina) Pups of the German North Sea. Biol Trace Elem Res 127: 28-36.
31. Graham EAM (2007) DNA reviews: ancient DNA. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 3:221–225
32. Hart M, Budgen P (2008) Forensic record-keeping and documentation of samples. ApplHerpetol 5:386–401
33. King DP, Dukes JP, Reid SM, Ebert K and others (2008) Prospects for rapid diagnosis of footand-mouth disease in the field using reverse transcriptase-PCR. Vet Rec 162: 315–316
34. Kuiken T, Simpson VR, Allchin CR, Bennett PM and others (1994) Mass mortality of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in southwest England due to incidental capture in fishing gear. Vet Rec 134:81–89
35. Lawton MPC, Cooper JE (2009) Wildlife crime scene visits. ApplHerpetol 6:29–45
36. Lawton ME, Sutton JG (1982) Species identification of deer blood by isoelectric focusing. J Forensic Sci 22:361–366
37. McDowall IL (2008) DNA technology and its applications in herpetological research and forensic investigations involving reptiles and amphibians. ApplHerpetol 5: 371–385
39. Morgan RM, Wiltshire P, Parker A, Bull PA (2006) The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. Forensic Sci Int 162:152–162
40. Wolfes R, Mathe J, Seitz A (1991) Forensics of birds of prey by DNA fingerprinting with P-labelled oligonucleotide probes. Electrophoresis 12:175–180 Yates B (1999)
41. The morphology of secondary guard hairs. Proc Internatl Assoc Forensic Sci 75th Triennial Meeting, August 22–28, 1999
42. Los Angeles, CA Zhang Y, Wang X, Ryder O, Li H, Zhang H, Yong Y, Wang P (2002) Genetic diversity and conservation of endangered animal species. Pure Appl Chem 74:575–584
43. Ross HM, Wilson B (1996) Violent interactions between bottlenose dolphins and harbour porpoises. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:283–286 Townley L, Ede R (2004) Forensic practice in criminal cases. The Law Society, London White P (2004) (ed)
44. Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Sjögren KG, Rasmussen S, Rasmussen M, et al. (2015) Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522: 167-72.
45. Wadsworth C, Buckley M (2014) Proteome degradation in fossils: investigating the longevity of protein survival in ancient bone. Rapid Commun Mass Specom 28: 605-15.
46. Rohman A, Nugroho A, Lukitaningsih E, Sudjadi (2014) Application of Vibrational Spectroscopy in Combination with Chemometrics Techniques for Authen¬tication of Herbal Medicine. ApplSpectrosc Rev 49: 603-13.
47. Laasonen M, Harmia-Pulkkinen T, Simard CL, Michiels E, Räsänen M, et al. (2002) Fast identification of Echinacea purpurea dried roots using near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chem 74: 2493-9.
48. Chang CW, Laird DA, Mausbach MJ, Hurburgh CR (2001) Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy– Principal Components Regression Analyses of Soil Proper-ties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 480–90.
49. Cen H, He Y (2007) Theory and application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in determination of food quality. Trends Food Sci Tech 18: 72-83.
50. Huang H, Yu H, Xu H, Ying Y (2008) Near infrared spectroscopy for on/in-line monitoring of quality in foods and beverages: A review. J Food Eng 87: 303-13.
51. Palumbi SR, Cipriano F (1998) Species identification using genetic tools: the value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences in whale conservation. J Hered 89: 459-64.
52. Roman J, Bowen BW (2000) The mock turtle syndrome: genetic identification of turtle meat purchased in the south-eastern United States of America. Anim Conservation 3: 61-5.
53. Waits L, Taberlet P, Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Franzén R (2000) Nuclear DNA microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and gene flow in the Scandinavian brown bear (Ursus arctos). Mol Ecol 9: 421-31.
54. Seeb JE, Kruse GH, Seeb LW, Weck RG (1990) Genetic structure of red king crab populations in Alaska facilitates enforcement of fishing regulations. Proc Int symposium on King and Tanner crabs. Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbank 491-502.
55. Martiniaková M, Grosskopf B, Omelka R, Vondráková M, Bauerová M (2006) Differences among species in compact bone tissue microstructure of mammalian skeleton: use of a discriminant function analysis for species identification. J Forensic Sci 51: 1235-9.
56. Hollmann T, Byard RW, Tsokos M (2008) The processing of skeletonized human remains found in Berlin, Germany. J Forensic Leg Med 15: 420-5.
57. Hillier ML, Bell LS (2007) Differentiating human bone from animal bone: a review of histological methods. J Forensic Sci 52: 249-63.
58. Kuo HW, Kuo SM, Chou CH, Lee TC (2000) Determination of 14 elements in Taiwanese bones. Sci Total Environ 255: 45-54.
59. Kakuschke A, Griesel S, Fonfara S, Rosenberger T, Prange A (2008) Concentrations of Selected Essential and Non-Essential Elements in Blood of Harbor Seal (PhocaVitulina) Pups of the German North Sea. Biol Trace Elem Res 127: 28-36.
60. Ogden R, Dawnay N, McEwing R (2009) Wildlife DNA forensics—bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement. Endang Species Res 9: 179-95.
61. Wilson-Wilde L, Norman J, Robertson J, Sarre S, Georges A (2010) Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6: 233-41.
62. An J, Lee MY, Min MS, Lee MH, Lee H (2007) A molecular genetic approach for species identification of mammals and sex determination of birds in a forensic case of poaching from South Korea. Forensic Sci Int 167: 59-61.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.