Jalakandan B., Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia and critical care, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry 605102, India. , Gunaseelan Sivasamy1 , Jalakandan B.2 , Thirunavukkarasu M.J.3 , Raghuraman M.S.4 , Shafeek A.K.5
Introduction: Igel and LMAC are most commonly used supraglottic air way devices to secure the airway during general anaesthesia our main objectives were to compare the ease of insertion, duration of insertion and number of attempts of insertion between Igel group and LMAC group. Methodology: Prospective randomized study conducted in SVMCH & RC Puducherry, during the period Oct 2015 to Mar 2017. Total patients 120 were divided into two groups LMAC, n = 60 and Igel, n = 60 by randomized method. SPSS 23 Version software was applied for t test as mean±SD for continuous variables and chisquare test used for categorical variables. Results: Igel was more easily inserted then LMAC group (90%, 85%) respectively and was statistically nonsignificant (p>0.05). Duration of insertion was shorter in Igel group compared to LMAC group (9.7±1.02 Vs 17.2±1.99) respectively and statistically highly significant (p<0.001). First attempt success rate was (95% Vs 91.6%) between Igel and LMAC group. Number of insertion attempts between these groups were statistically non significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: Duration of insertion of highly shorter in Igel group. Ease of insertion and first attempt success rate makes and Igel a suitable alternative for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.
No records found.
| Received | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
Monday 13 July 2026, 05:08:10 (IST)
Download citation
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
| Received | N/A |
| Accepted | N/A |
| Published | N/A |