Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Current Trends in Forensic Odontology: A Literature Review

Ayappali Kalluvalappil Nabeel, Consultant, Deparment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Dental Home, Pee Key Z Arcade, Ayikkarappadi, Malappuram, Kerala 673637, India.nabeelsabeel@gmail.com null, Ayappali Kalluvalappil Nabeel1 null, P Nasma2 null, Febin Shalu3 null

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Forensic Odontology 15(2):p 83-88, july-december 2022. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijfo.0974.505X.15222.4

How Cite This Article:

Ayappali Kalluvalappil Nabeel, P Nasma, Febin Shalu/Current Trends in Forensic Odontology: A Literature Review/Indian Journal of Forensic Odontology. 2022;15(2):83–88.


Timeline

Received : September 20, 2022         Accepted : October 26, 2022          Published : December 20, 2022

Abstract

Aim & Objectives: To Our society is facing new challenges, from an increase in crime to a rise in natural disasters. Despite advances in technology, it is still difficult to identify criminals using medical techniques. Dental tissues are frequently still present in corpses that have been burned, decomposed, skeletonized, or dismembered. So, forensic odontology has proven to be a crucial science in medical legal cases and in the process of identifying the deceased. This article gives a broad overview of contemporary forensic odontology concepts and the changing trends in traditional methods.


References

  • 1.   Auerkari E. Recent trends in dental forensics. Indonesian Journal of Legal and Forensic Sciences
  • 2.   Saranya. V, Malathi. N. Forensic odontology: a brief review. Sri Ramachandra Journal of Medicine 2014; 7: 22–28.
  • 3.   Keiser-Neilsen S. Bristol: John Wright and Sons; 1980. Person Identification by means of Teeth.
  • 4.   Aishwarya Menon P, Anoop Kumar N. Recent advances in forensic odontology: An overview.
  • 5.   Jeddy N, Ravi S, Radhika T. Current trends in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017; 9: 115.
  • 6.   Kaleelullah RA, Hamid P. Forensic Odontology, a Boon and a Humanitarian Tool: A Literature
  • 7.   Devore DT. Radiology and photography in forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21: 69–84.
  • 8.   Bagi BS. Role of forensic odontology in medicine. J Indian Dent Assoc 1977; 49: 359–363.
  • 9.   Schuller-Götzburg P, Suchanek J. Forensic odontologists successfully identify tsunami victims in Phuket, Thailand. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 171: 204–207.
  • 10.   Sansare K. Forensic odontology, historical perspective. Indian journal of dental research 1995; 6: 55–57.
  • 11.   Sweet D. Why a dentist for identification? Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 237–251.
  • 12.   Hegde P, Shetty S, Gupta L. Role and Importance of forensic odontology in identification. Int Interdiscip J Sci Res 2014; 1: 64–69.
  • 13.   Zakirulla M, Meer A. Modern Tools in Forensic Dentistry. International Journal of Contemporary
  • 14.   Hinchliffe. Forensic odontology, part 1. Dental identification. Brit Dent J 2011; 210: 219–224.
  • 15.   Rocha S dos S, Ramos DL, Cavalcanti M de GP. Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. Pesquisa odontologica brasileira 2003; 17: 24–28.
  • 16.   Gorza L, Mânica S. Accuracy of dental identification of individuals with unrestored permanent teeth by visual comparison with radiographs of mixed dentition. Forensic Sci Int 2018; 289: 337–343.
  • 17.   Hubar JS, Carr RF. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position. J Forensic Sci 1999; 44: 401–404.
  • 18.   Harvey W. Dental identification and forensic odontology. London: Henry Kimpton Publishers, 1976.
  • 19.   Bhargava K, Bhargava D, Rastogi P, et al. An overview of Bite mark analysis. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2012; 34: 61–66.
  • 20.   Epstein JB, Scully C. Mammalian bites: risk and management. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 167–171.
  • 21.   van der Velden A, Spiessens M, Willems G. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2006; 24: 14–17.
  • 22.   Pretty IA, Sweet D. Anatomical location of bitemarks and associated findings in 101 cases from the United States. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45: 14775J.
  • 23.   Brown KA, Elliot TR, Rogers AH, et al. The survival of oral streptococci on human skin and its implication in bite-mark investigation. Forensic Sci Int 1984; 26: 193–197.
  • 24.   Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci 1974; 3: 233–248.
  • 25.   Prabhu R v., Dinkar A, Prabhu V. A study of lip print pattern in Goan dental students - A digital approach. J Forensic Leg Med 2012; 19: 390–395.
  • 26.   Reddy LVK. Lip prints: An Overview in Forensic Dentistry. J Adv Oral Res 2011; 2: 17–20.
  • 27.   Krishnan RP, Thangavelu R, Rathnavelu V, et al. Gender determination: Role of lip prints, finger prints and mandibular canine index. Exp Ther Med 2016; 11: 2329–2332.
  • 28.   Krishnappa S, Srinath S, Bhardwaj P, et al. Palatal rugoscopy: Implementation in forensic odontology–A review. J Adv Med Dent 2013; 1: 53–59.
  • 29.   Sweet D, Hildebrand D. Recovery of DNA from human teeth by cryogenic grinding. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 1199–1202.
  • 30.   Sweet D, DiZinno JA. Personal identification through dental evidence—tooth fragments to DNA. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996; 24: 35–42.
  • 31.   Silva RHA, Musse J de O, Melani RFH, et al. Human bite mark identification and DNA technology in forensic dentistry. Braz J Oral Sci 2006; 5: 1193–1197.
  • 32.   Sakari SL, Jimson S, Masthan KMK, et al. Role of DNA profiling in forensic odontology. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7: S138.
  • 33.   Omstead J. Facial Reconstruction. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 2011; 10: 1–7.
  • 34.   Verzé L. History of facial reconstruction. Acta Biomed 2009; 80: 5–12.
  • 35.   Rocha S dos S, Ramos DL, Cavalcanti M de GP. Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. Pesquisa odontologica brasileira 2003; 17: 24–28.
  • 36.   Rathee M, Yadav K. Denture identification methods: A review. IOSR J Dent Med 2014; 13: 58–61.
  • 37.   Thomas T, Muruppel A, Dinesh N, et al. Dentures in forensic identification–A review of methods benefits. J Adv Med Dent 2014; 2: 85–94.
  • 38.   Bali S, Naqash T, Abdullah S, et al. Denture identification methods: A review. Int J Health Sci Res 2013; 3: 100–104.
  • 39.   Sumalatha S, Padmaja S, Thumati P. Every contact leaves its trace: Insight into recent advances of forensic odontology. J Cancer Treat Res 2015; 3: 1–7.
  • 40.   Stefanescu C, Popa M, Candea LS. Preliminary study on the tongue-based forensic identification. Rom J Leg Med 2014; 22: 263–266.
  • 41.   Nimbulkar G, Patil R, Nathani S, et al. Tongue Prints: A Forensic Review. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology 2020; 14: 6802–6806.
  • 42.   Manjunath K, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Analysis of enamel rod end patterns on tooth surface for personal identification—ameloglyphics. J Forensic Sci 2012; 57: 789–793.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Ayappali Kalluvalappil Nabeel, P Nasma, Febin Shalu/Current Trends in Forensic Odontology: A Literature Review/Indian Journal of Forensic Odontology. 2022;15(2):83–88.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
September 20, 2022 October 26, 2022 December 20, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijfo.0974.505X.15222.4

Keywords

Forensic Odontology; Dental Identification; Bite marks; Cheiloscopy; Rugoscopy.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 17 October 2026, 10:47:02 (IST)


1937

Accesses

15
267
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received September 20, 2022
Accepted October 26, 2022
Published December 20, 2022

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share