Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Current International Trends in Breast Augmentation

Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Jacob Antony Chakiath

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 9(2):p 73-83, july-december 2022. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.9222.4

How Cite This Article:

Jacob Antony Chakiath, Ravi Kumar Chittoria/Current International Trends in Breast Augmentation/Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine; 9(2):73–83.

Timeline

Received : October 15, 2022         Accepted : November 10, 2022          Published : December 30, 2022

Abstract

Breast augmentation continues to be the most frequently performed aesthetic surgical procedure worldwide. Improved implant design coupled with surgical advances mean that high quality results with few complications can now be expected in the majority and a precise of progress is perhaps timely. This article forms provide a history of breast augmentation, evolution of breast implant, standardized strategic steps of breast augmentation and compare breast augmentation techniques on an international level.


References

  • 1.   International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/ Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2015. USA: 8. Accessed January 20, 2017.
  • 2.   Hidalgo DA. Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. PlastReconstr Surg. 2000;105(6):2202-2216; discussion 2217.
  • 3.   Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. PlastReconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):567e-583e.
  • 4.   Chang JB, Small KH, Choi M, Karp NS. Threedimensional surface imaging in plastic surgery: foundation, practical applications, and beyond. PlastReconstr Surg. 2015;135 5):1295-1304.
  • 5.   Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP. Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. PlastReconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2441-2450.
  • 6.   Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. ClinPlast Surg. 2009;36(2):269-80, viii.
  • 7.   Khouri RK, Eisenmann-Klein M, Cardoso E, et al. Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: results of a 6-year, 81-patient, prospective multicenter study. PlastReconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):1173-1187.
  • 8.   Kovacs L, Eder M, Zimmermann A, et al. Threedimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):879-887.
  • 9.   Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. PlastReconstr Surg. 2014;134(5):932-938.
  • 10.   Roostaeian J, Adams WP Jr. Three-dimensional imaging for breast augmentation: Is this technology providing accurate simulations? AesthetSurg J. 2014;34(6): 857-875.
  • 11.   Voglimacci M, Garrido I, Mojallal A, et al. Autologous fat grafting for cosmetic breast augmentation: a systematic review. AesthetSurg J. 2015;35(4):378-393.
  • 12.   Czerny V. Plastischer ersatz der brust drusedurcheinlipom. ZentralblChir 1895;27:72.
  • 13.   Nahabedian M. Explantation of 41-year-old implants following primary breast augmentation. Ann PlastSurg 2007;58:91e4.
  • 14.   Watson J. Some observations on free fat grafts: with reference to their use in mammaplasty. Br J PlastSurg 1959;12:263e74.
  • 15.   Kijima Y, Yoshinaka H, Owaki T, et al. Early experience of immediate reconstruction using autologous free dermal fat graft after breast conservational surgery. J PlastReconstrAesthetSurg 2007;60:495e502.
  • 16.   Gabriel SE, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT, et al. Risk of connective tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1697e702.
  • 17.   Sanchez-Guerrero J, Colditz GA, Karlson EW, et al. Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1666e70.
  • 18.   Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS. Meta-analysis of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. N Engl J Med 2000;342:781e90.
  • 19.   Institute of Medicine. Safety of silicone breast implants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • 20.   Muzaffar AR, Rohrich RJ. The silicone gelfilled breast implant controversy: an update. PlastReconstrSurg 2001;109:742e7.
  • 21.   Deapen DM, Hirsch EM, Brody GS. Cancer risk among Los Angeles women with cosmetic breast implants. PlastReconstrSurg 2007;119:1987e92.
  • 22.   Spear S. The breast implant story. Ann PlastSurg 2006;56: 573e83
  • 23.   Tebbetts JB, Tebbetts TB. The best breast. 1st ed. Dallas: CosmetXpertise; 1999.
  • 24.   Derby BM, Codner MA. Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review. PlastReconstrSurg 2015; 135(1):113–124.
  • 25.   Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Breast implant design. Gland Surg 2017; 6(2):148–153.
  • 26.   Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. The evolution of breast implants. ClinPlastSurg 2015; 42(4):399–404.
  • 27.   American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Procedural statistics trends 1992–2012. Accessed January 17, 2019.
  • 28.   American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics report 2016.-statistics-fullreport-2016.pdf. Accessed January 17, 2019.
  • 29.   Henderson PW, Nash D, Laskowski M, Grant RT. Objective comparison of commercially available breast implant devices. Aesthetic PlastSurg 2015; 39(5):724–732.
  • 30.   Adams WP Jr, Mallucci P. Breast augmentation. PlastReconstrSurg 2012; 130(4):597e–611e.
  • 31.   Spear SL, Jespersen MR. Breast implants: saline or silicone? AesthetSurg J 2010; 30(4):557–570.
  • 32.   Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammaplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transactions of the Third International Conference of Plastic Surgery: October 13–18, 1963, Washington, DC.
  • 33.   Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The evolution of breast implants. PlastReconstrSurg 2014; 134(suppl 1):12S–17S.
  • 34.   Hillard C, Fowler JD, Barta R, Cunningham B. Silicone breast implant rupture: a review. Gland Surg 2017; 6(2):163–168. doi:10.21037/gs.2016.09.12
  • 35.   Derby BM, Codner MA. Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review. PlastReconstrSurg 2015; 135(1):113–124.
  • 36.   Tugwell P, Wells G, Peterson J, et al. Do silicone breast implants cause rheumatologic disorders? A systematic review for a court-appointed national science panel. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44(11):2477– 2484.
  • 37.   Alpert BS, Lalonde DH. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: breast augmentation. PlastReconstrSurg 2008; 121(suppl 4):1–7.
  • 38.   Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. PlastReconstrSurg 2014; 133(4):567e–583e.
  • 39.   ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of the safety and effectiveness of Motiva Implants. Accessed January 17, 2019.
  • 40.   EstablishmentLabs. MotivaImplants.https:// motivaimplants.com/whymotiva/innovationfor-enhanced-safety/. Accessed January 17, 2019.
  • 41.   Hidalgo et al, Current Trends in Breast Augmentation, Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2018, Vol 38(2) 133–148.
  • 42.   Sforza M, Zaccheddu R, Alleruzzo A, et al. Preliminary 3-year evaluation of experience with silksurface and velvetsurface Motiva silicone breast implants: a single-center experience with 5813 consecutive breast augmentation cases. AesthetSurg J 2018; 38(suppl 2):S62–S73.
  • 43.   Huemer GM, Wenny R, Aitzetmüller MM, Duscher D. Motiva ergonomix round silksurface silicone breast implants: outcome analysis of 100 primary breast augmentations over 3 years and technical considerations. PlastReconstrSurg 2018; 141(6):831e–842e.
  • 44.   Choudry U, Kim N, Cunningham B. The BodyLogicTM system: intelligent implant selection in primary breast augmentation. JSurg Res. 2014;186:672.
  • 45.   Khavanin N, Jordan SW, Rambachan A, et al. A systematic review of single-stage augmentationmastopexy. PlastReconstr Surg. 2014;134:922–931.
  • 46.   Nahai F, Fisher J, Maxwell PG, et al. Augmentation mastopexy: to stage or not. AesthetSurg J. 2007;27:297–305.
  • 47.   Alderman AK, Hall-Findlay EJ. Principles of mastopexy. In: Calobrace MB, Kortesis BG, Bharti G, et al (Eds.) AugmentationMastopexy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020.
  • 48.   Sanniec K, Adams WP. Principles of breast augmentation: the process of augmentation mastopexy and criteria for staging. In Calobrace MB, Kortesis BG (Eds). Augmentation Mastopexy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020:11–29.
  • 49.   Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al; American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.
  • 50.   Brink RR. Management of true ptosis of the breast. PlastReconstr Surg. 1993;91:657–662.
  • 51.   Raffi et al, Breast Augmentation Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, Volume 86, February 2019.
  • 52.   Choudry U, Kim N, Cunningham B. The BodyLogicTM system: intelligent implant selection in primary breast augmentation. JSurg Res. 2014;186:672.
  • 53.   Persoff MM. Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:13–19.
  • 54.   de Jong D, Vasmel WL, de Boer JP, et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma in women with breast implants. JAMA. 2008;300(17):2030-2035.
  • 55.   Egeberg A, Sørensen JA. The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(2):255-259.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Jacob Antony Chakiath, Ravi Kumar Chittoria/Current International Trends in Breast Augmentation/Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine; 9(2):73–83.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
October 15, 2022 November 10, 2022 December 30, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.9222.4

Keywords

Breast AugmentationBreastSilicone ImplantAesthetic Breast;Breast ImplantAugmentation Mastopexy

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 30 July 2026, 02:40:51 (IST)


1008

Accesses

9
175
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 15, 2022
Accepted November 10, 2022
Published December 30, 2022

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share