Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Conventional Palatoplasty Versus Physiological Palatoplasty

Ravi Kumar Chittoria** , Sandhya Pandey* , Ravi Kumar Chittoria** , Mohapatra Devi Prasad*** , Friji M.T.*** , Dinesh Kumar Sivakumar*** , Bibilash Babu Suseela*

Author Information

Licence:




New Indian Journal of Surgery 7(2):p 95-102, May-Aug 2016. | DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.7216.2

How Cite This Article:


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

 Cleft lip and palate are variations of a type of congenital deformity caused by abnormal facial development during gestation. The main organs affected are mouth, nose and ear. Hence treatment of the condition is aimed to provide optimum function of all these organs. Apart from correction of oral competence and ear pathology, speech correction is always a challenging aspect of the management in patients of cleft palate. Various methods of palatoplasty have been described ranging from anatomical closure to the functional closure of the defect. Both methods have their own advantage, disadvantages and outcomes. We present a case series to compare these two methods with special reference to speech outcome.

Keywords: Cleft Palate; Palatoplasty; Intravelar Veloplasty.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.7216.2

Keywords


Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 29 July 2026, 22:00:06 (IST)


3359

Accesses

3
295
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share