Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Complications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Alka Patil, Chaitanya Sukdeo Deore, Hetashvi Sudani

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 9(1):p 17-23, january-June 2022. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.9122.2

How Cite This Article:

Alka Patil, Chaitanya Sukdeo Deore, Hetashvi Sudani/Complications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies/Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2022;9(1):17–23.

Timeline

Received : July 28, 2021         Accepted : September 10, 2021          Published : June 30, 2022

Abstract

ART methods are boon to infertile couples. Though ART methods are practiced widely in every country today. There is debate regarding their efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and risk factors. Women who conceive by ART have a high risk of maternal and perinatal complications such as ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy-induced hypertension, placenta previa, placental abruption, morbidly adherent placenta, preterm birth, and low birth weight. Gynecological complications associated with ART are OHHS, pelvic infection, and psychological and laboratory risks. Couples are encouraged to consider psychological counseling as an additional means of stress management. There is a higher incidence of multiple gestations in ART-associated pregnancies.


References

  • 1.   Joseph G. Schenker, M.D.Yossef Ezra, M.D. Complications of assisted reproductive techniques, Fertility and Sterility, Vol 61 No 3 March 1994.
  • 2.   Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, et al. international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1588–609.
  • 3.   Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou J, Chapman MG, et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? BJOG: A systematic review and meta-analysis; 2018.
  • 4.   Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85 e71–76.
  • 5.   Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1492–508 e1491–1497.
  • 6.   Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485–503.
  • 7.   Esh-Broder E, Ariel I, Abas-Bashir N, Bdolah Y, Celnikier DH. Placenta accrete is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. BJOG. 2011; 118(9):1084–9.
  • 8.   Pratik Tambe,Krishnakumar. ICMR guidelines and practice of infertility. Meenakshi Megh playing by the rules FOGSI CBS publishers Delhi first edition 2015.
  • 9.   Jaideep Malhotra,Randhri Puri,Narendra Malhotra,Rajeev Sharma step-by-step assisted reproductive technology JAypee Delhi 2010
  • 10.   Norman Jeffcoate assisted reproductive technology Narendra Malhotra Jaideep Malhotra Niharika Malhotra Bora Jeffcoate’s principal of gynaecology JP Delhi ninth addition
  • 11.   Sonia Malik, Rashmi Sharma, Assisted reproductive Technology (ART). Sudha Salman, Textbook of Gynaecology JAYPEE Delhi first edition 2011.
  • 12.   Jaideep Malhotra, RandhirPuri, Narendra Malhotra, Rajeev Sharma, Obstetrics complication of ART. Jaideeep Malhotra, Randhir Puri, Narendra Malhotra, Rajeev Sharma, Assisted Reroductive Technology. JAYPEE Delhi 2010.
  • 13.   American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM Practice Parameter for the performance of foetal echocardiography. Laurel (MD): AIUM; 2013.Available at: http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/fetalEcho.pdf. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
  • 14.   Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, Copel JA, Sklansky MS, Abuhamad A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of foetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. American Heart Association Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anaesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing [published erratum appears in Circulation 2014;129: e512]. Circulation 2014; 129:2183–242.
  • 15.   Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, de Laveaucoupet J, Quere MP, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS One. 2014;9(4): e94866.
  • 16.   Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Kennedy AM, Richards DS, Winter TC, 3rd, Woodward PJ, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound for the prediction of placenta accreta. Am J Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;211(2): 177. e171–e177.
  • 17.   J.A.Land and J.L.H.Ever’sRisks and complications in assisted reproductiontechniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting*Human Reproduction Vol.18, No.2 pp. 455-457, 2003.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Alka Patil, Chaitanya Sukdeo Deore, Hetashvi Sudani/Complications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies/Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2022;9(1):17–23.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Received Accepted Published
July 28, 2021 September 10, 2021 June 30, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.9122.2

Keywords

Assisted Reproductive TechniquesMultiple GestationCounsellingInfertilityBirth Defects

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 30 July 2026, 06:53:09 (IST)


1009

Accesses

13
175
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received July 28, 2021
Accepted September 10, 2021
Published June 30, 2022

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Access this article



Share