Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparison of Sensory Blockade of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine alone Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia in Endoscopic Urologic Procedures

Delanda Kurian, M. Paul Wilson, Dixsha T P

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 13(3):p 121-126, July-September 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.13326.1

How Cite This Article:

Delanda Kurian, M. Paul Wilson, Dixsha T P. Comparison of Sensory Blockade of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine alone Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia in Endoscopic Urologic Procedures. Ind J Anesth Analg. 2026; 13(3): 121-126.

Timeline

Received : June 29, 2026         Accepted : July 31, 2026          Published : September 25, 2026

Abstract

Background: For the majority of endoscopic urological operations, spinal anesthesia is the recommended anesthetic approach because it offers enough muscle relaxation and efficient intraoperative analgesia. Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine is widely used for subarachnoid block; however, higher doses may produce hypotension, prolonged motor blockade, and delayed recovery, particularly in elderly patients. It has been demonstrated that intrathecal fentanyl improves block quality, permits dose reduction, and increases the analgesic effectiveness of local anesthetics. Objective of the study: To assess the sensory block properties of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (7.5 mg) in combination with 25 mcg of fentanyl in patients having endoscopic urological procedures. Methods: Forty ASA physical status I and II participants who were scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgery under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective observational study. Two groups of twenty participants each were formed. Group BF received 7.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mcg of fentanyl intrathecally, while Group B received 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Time to commencement of sensory block, time to peak sensory block, and duration of sensory blockade were the main outcome measures. With statistical significance set at p < 0.05, the independent Student’s t-test was used for intergroup comparisons after data analysis using SPSS. Results: Participants in Group BF demonstrated a significantly faster onset of sensory blockade than those in Group B (3.40 ± 0.60 vs. 5.30 ± 0.57 minutes; p <0.001). Peak sensory block was also achieved earlier in Group BF (6.95 ± 0.89 vs. 7.85 ± 0.59 minutes; p < 0.001). In addition, the duration of sensory blockade was significantly longer in Group BF (214.50 ± 8.87 vs. 140.75 ± 4.94 minutes; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In comparison to conventional-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine alone, the addition of 25 mcg intrathecal fentanyl to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine produced a faster onset, earlier peak, and noticeably longer duration of sensory blockade. This combination may represent an effective spinal anesthetic technique for endoscopic urological procedures, particularly in elderly patients.


References

  • 1.   Labbene I, Lamine K, Gharsallah H, Jebali A, Adhoum A, Ghozzi S, et al. Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological surgery--low dose vs. varying doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;19(2):369– 84. PubMed PMID: 17684877.
  • 2.   Gupta S, Sampley S, Kathuria S, Katyal S. Intrathecal sufentanil or fentanyl as adjuvants to low dose bupivacaine in endoscopic urological procedures. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(4):509–15. doi:10.4103/0970- 9185.119158 PubMed PMID: 24249989; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3819846.
  • 3.   Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Pitkänen MT, Helenius HY, Kirvelä OA. The Use of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery: Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1452–6. doi:10.1097/00000539- 200012000-00029
  • 4.   Kararmaz A, Kaya S, Turhanoglu S, Ozyilmaz MA. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Anaesthesia. 2003 Jun;58(6):526–30. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03153.x PubMed PMID: 12846615.
  • 5.   Ben-David B, Frankel R, Arzumonov T, Marchevsky Y, Volpin G. Minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the aged. Anesthesiology. 2000 Jan;92(1):6–10. doi:10.1097/00000542-200001000-00007 PubMed PMID: 10638892.
  • 6.   Fonseca NM, Guimarães GMN, Pontes JPJ, Azi LMT de A, de Ávila Oliveira R. Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2023 Mar 1;73(2):198–216. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.10.010
  • 7.   Patra P, Kapoor MC, Nair TGM. Spinal Anaesthesia with Low Dose Bupivacaine and Fentanyl for Endoscopic Urological Surgeries.
  • 8.   Hussien RM, Rabie AH. Sequential intrathecal injection of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine at different rates: does it make a difference? A randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Apr 1;72(2):150–5. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00173
  • 9.   Labbene I, Lamine K, Gharsallah H, Jebali A, Adhoum A, Ghozzi S, et al. Spinal Anesthesia for Endoscopic Urological Surgery. 2007.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Delanda Kurian, M. Paul Wilson, Dixsha T P. Comparison of Sensory Blockade of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine alone Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia in Endoscopic Urologic Procedures. Ind J Anesth Analg. 2026; 13(3): 121-126.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
June 29, 2026 July 31, 2026 September 25, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.13326.1

Keywords

Sensory BlockadeHyperbaric BupivacaineIntrathecal FentanylEndoscopic Urologic ProceduresSpinal Anesthesia

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 12 September 2026, 07:58:18 (IST)


9102

Accesses

6
821
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received June 29, 2026
Accepted July 31, 2026
Published September 25, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share