Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparative Efficacy of General Anaesthesia versus Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Amit Bhardwaj, Tulip 506 Bellevue Green Appartments, Mithapur to Khurla Kingra Road, Jalandhar- 144003, Punjab, India. , Bhardwaj Amit1 , Singh A.P.2 , Singh Iqbal3 , Kumar Rajneesh4 , Goyal Subash5

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 4(3):p 565-568, July - September 2017. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4317.1

How Cite This Article:


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Comparative efficacy of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objective: The aim was to compare general anaesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cholecystectomy evaluating intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, Post Operative analgesic and side effects. Method: A double blind study was conducted on 50 ASA grade I, II and III patients who received spinal anesthesia in group 1 (N=25) and general anesthesia in group II (N=25). Assessment of the block, vital monitoring and complications were noted. Results: No significant differences were observed in both the groups hypotension, bradycardia were more frequent in patients those who underwent spinal anesthesia. Satisfaction was similar in both groups. Conclusion: General Anesthesia is a better choice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nevertheless in respiratory compromised patients, Spinal Anesthesia is a better choice.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4317.1

Keywords

Spinal Anesthesia; General Anesthesia; Laparoscopic; Cholecystectomy.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 07 February 2026, 19:25:06 (IST)


1189

Accesses

0
194
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share