Full Text (PDF)
Case Report

An Inevitable Caesarean Section Secondary to Iatrogenic Cervical Stenosis following Hysteroscopic Polypectomy

Anusha Devalla, Puja Bhol, VedPrakash Rao Cheruvu

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 11(2):p 63-65, July-December 2024. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.11224.5

How Cite This Article:

Anusha Devalla, Puja Bhol, VedPrakash Rao Cheruvu. An Inevitable Caesarean Section Secondary to Iatrogenic Cervical Stenosis following Hysteroscopic Polypectomy. Ind J Matern-Fetal & Neonatal Med 2024;11(2):63-65.

Timeline

Received : October 10, 2024         Accepted : November 12, 2024          Published : December 30, 2024

Abstract

Background: Cervical septum, a rare congenital uterine anomaly, can occasionally be acquired following surgical procedures on the cervix or in the uterus. While most cases are diagnosed incidentally during evaluation for infertility or recurrent miscarriage, acquired cervical septa have been rarely reported following cervical interventions such as hysteroscopy, conization. The impact of such abnormality on subsequent pregnancy outcomes still remains largely unexplored. Aim: Here, we report the case of a 28-year-old female, gravida 3, abortion 2, at 37+4 weeks, with gestational hypertension, who presented for safe confinement and was found to have a cervical septum. Discussion and conclusion: This anomaly is believed to have developed following a hysteroscopic cervical polypectomy performed. The clinical course and management of this patient underscore the need for heightened awareness of potential complications following such interventions on labour.


References

  • 1.   Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Meyer P, Philippe E. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;88(6):933–8.
  • 2.   Higuchi N, Sako Y, Shiota K, Hirata T. Cervical Stenosis After Hysteroscopic Surgery for Cesarean Scar Disorder. Cureus. 16(3):e56922.
  • 3.   Kalstone C. Cervical stenosis in pregnancy: A complication of cryotherapyin diethylstilbestrolexposed women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992 Feb 1;166(2):502–3.
  • 4.   Vitale SG, De Angelis MC, Della Corte L, Saponara S, Carugno J, Laganà AS, et al. Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 1;309(3):755–64.
  • 5.   Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, Spinelli M, Ceci O, Fascilla FD, et al. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5):e16–7.
  • 6.   Pluchino N, Ninni F, Angioni S, Artini P, Araujo VG, Massimetti G, et al. Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(3):344–50.
  • 7.   The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology | ACOG [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 31]. Available from:https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinicalguidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/03/the-use-of-hysteroscopy-for-the-diagnosis-andtreatment-of-intrauterine-pathology
  • 8.   Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 31]. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17482613/
  • 9.   Groutz A, Lessing JB, Wolf Y, Yovel I, Azem F, Amit A. Cervical dilatation during ovum pickup in patients with cervical stenosis: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):909–11.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Anusha Devalla, Puja Bhol, VedPrakash Rao Cheruvu. An Inevitable Caesarean Section Secondary to Iatrogenic Cervical Stenosis following Hysteroscopic Polypectomy. Ind J Matern-Fetal & Neonatal Med 2024;11(2):63-65.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
October 10, 2024 November 12, 2024 December 30, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijmfnm.2347.999X.11224.5

Keywords

Acquired cervical stenosisHysteroscopic polypectomylabour dystociaOperative hysteroscopy.Hysteroscopic polypectomylabour dystociaOperative hysteroscopy.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 30 July 2026, 00:31:31 (IST)


1008

Accesses

10
175
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 10, 2024
Accepted November 12, 2024
Published December 30, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share