Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

A Study to Examine Consumer Adaptation Towards EV

Siranjeevi S, Poojasri S

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Social Welfare and Management 14(3 (Part-I)):p 123-129, September-December 2022. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jswm.0975.0231.14322.12

How Cite This Article:

Poojasri S, Siranjeevi S/A Study to Examine Consumer Adaptation Towards EV/J Soc Welfare Manag. 2022;14,3(Part-I):123–129

Timeline

Received : July 14, 2022         Accepted : August 01, 2022          Published : December 25, 2022

Abstract

The first electric vehicle, or EV for short, appeared in 1828. Electric vehicles, on the other hand, have just recently experienced a surge in popularity. A variety of factors, including heightened awareness of climate change, technological breakthroughs, and the ascent of wellknown figures in the electric car business; have contributed to the recent expansion of the electric vehicle. It is of great importance for whole world to switch from non-renewable energy vehicles to clean energy for transportation. Electric vehicle is the major fillip on that, and the research divisions of various automobiles are experimenting with the viability of hydrogen vehicles and it yet to be found feasible.In this study, we are attempting to comprehend the most crucial elements in customer adoption of electric vehicle technology, and how those factors of performance, cost and charging infrastructure, negatively affect consumers to buy electric vehicles. A quantitative study is been exercised using structured and standard questionnaire, using Statistical software package (SPSS).The study identified a number of variables that affect the adoption of electric vehicles, including financial limits, vehicle performance constraints, a lack of equipment for supplying electric vehicles, environmental concerns, societal influence, and social awareness of electric vehicles. The study's findings assist policymakers in changing the present approach to electric vehicles in developing countries.


References

  • 1.   Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Identifying and characterizing potential electric vehicle adopters in Canada: A two-stage modelling approach. Transport Policy, 52, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006
  • 2.   Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001
  • 3.   Brady, J., & O’Mahony, M. (2011). Introduction of electric vehicles to Ireland: socioeconomic analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2242(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2242- 08
  • 4.   Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G., & Stromman, A. H. (2013). Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(1), 53–64. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x
  • 5.   Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., Wee, S., & Goodman, A. (2016). Electric vehicles revisited: A review of the factors that affect adoption. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 29–55. https://doi.or g/10.1080/01441647.2016.1200156
  • 6.   Jaramillo, P., Samaras, C., Wakeley, H., & Meisterling, K. (2009). Greenhouse gas implications of using coal for transportation: Life cycle assessment of coal-toliquids, plugin hybrids and hydrogen pathways. Energy Policy, 37(7), 2689–2695. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.enpol.2009.03.001
  • 7.   Larson, P. D., Viafara, J., Parsons, R. V., & Elias, A. (2014). Consumer attitudes about electric cars: pricing analysis and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A, 69, 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra. 2014.09.002
  • 8.   Yeh, Z., & Liu, S. (2007). Depressive realism: evidence from false interpersonal perception. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1440- 1819.2007.01628.x
  • 9.   Wiedmann, K., Hennigs, N., Schmidt, S., & Wuestefeld, T. (2011). Drivers and outcomes of brand heritage: consumers’ perception of heritage brands in the automotive industry. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.2753/ MTP1069-6679190206
  • 10.   Gary L. Brase (2018): What Would It Take to Get You into an Electric Car?,Consumer Perceptions and Decision Making about Electric Vehicles, The Journal of Psychology, Published online: 27 Sep 2018.
  • 11.   Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah1, Nurul Syafqah Tanwir1 Siti Norida Wahab1, Muhammad Hafz Abd Rashid1 - Consumer perceptions of hybrid electric vehicle adoption and the green automotive market: the Malaysian evidence. Accepted: 8 May 2021.
  • 12.   G. Krishna-Understanding and identifying barriers to electric vehicle adoption throughthematic analysis. Accepted 1 April 2021.
  • 13.   Shu Yang a, Peng Cheng b, Jun Li , Wang Shanyongc, - Which group should policies target? Effects of incentive policies and product cognitions for electric vehicle adoption among Chinese consumers. Accepted 22 September 2019.
  • 14.   Xiuhong He, Wenjie Zhan, Yingying Hu -Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perceptionand personality, 24 August 2018.
  • 15.   Xiang Zhang, Xue Bai, Jennifer Shang - Is subsidized electric vehicles adoption sustainable: Consumers’ perceptions and motivation toward incentive policies, environmental benefits, and risks, 27 April 2018.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Poojasri S, Siranjeevi S/A Study to Examine Consumer Adaptation Towards EV/J Soc Welfare Manag. 2022;14,3(Part-I):123–129


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
July 14, 2022 August 01, 2022 December 25, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jswm.0975.0231.14322.12

Keywords

Consumer IntentionsElectricvehicleConsumer adoptionsChargingCharging infrastructurePerformance barrierFinancial barrier and Incentives

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 29 August 2026, 11:40:43 (IST)


2138

Accesses

4
177
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received July 14, 2022
Accepted August 01, 2022
Published December 25, 2022

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share