Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Labetalol Versus Oral Nifedipine in Acute Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Emergencies of Pregnancy

Uma Mahesh Sindoor, Kiran Oswal

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 12(1):p 27-30, january-march 2024. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijog.2321.1636.12124.5

How Cite This Article:

Oswal K, Sindoor UM. A randomized trial of intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine in acute blood pressure control in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;12(1):27-30.

Timeline

Received : February 28, 2024         Accepted : March 28, 2024          Published : March 29, 2024

Abstract

Background: Hypertension in pregnancy, called a disease of degree is more of a sign than a disease by itself. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including chronic hypertension, with or without superimposed pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, gestational hypertension, HELLP syndrome, pre-eclampsia with or without severe features or eclampsia present a significant risk of morbidity to both mother and fetus. Effective pharmacologic therapy modifies the course of the disease. The effective use of anti-hypertensive therapy should be based on well designed controlled clinical trials and the experience of the clinician with the drugs. Hypertensive disorders complicate 5-10% of all pregnancies worldwide.1 Dangerous hypertension is a harbinger of cerebrovascular accidents, eclampsia, hypertensive encephalopathy and other end organ damage with a poor perinatal outcome.2 Methods: This prospective randomized double blind comparative clinical trial with randomization done using computer generated numbers study was carried out in 100 cases being brought in OBG department of AL Ameen Medical College, Bijapur, from July 2023 to December 2023. A detailed data of sociodemographic profile, general examination and obstetric examination were carried out. The pregnant women were randomized with computer generated numbers into two groups to receive either oral nifedipine or intermittent intravenous labetalol injections. Results: There is no significant difference in the parity of both the groups. Majority of the patients constituting 80% of group A and 58% of group B were primigravida. 69% enrolled in the study were primigravida. There is a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia in the first pregnancy. The majority of the patients had gestational age of 34 to 36 weeks constituting 48% on the whole with 50% and 46% respectively in group A and B. The recruited patients did not significantly differ in gestational age.


References

  • 1.   Cunningham F, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Pregnancy hypertension. In: Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill. 2010. p. 706-7.
  • 2.   Podymov T, August P. Update on the use of Antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. Hypertension. 2008;51:960-9.
  • 3.   Mukherjee S, Khan S, Jain U, et al. A comparative evaluation of intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine for control of severe pregnancy-induced hypertension with low-dose regimen. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016; 5(6): 1183.
  • 4.   Zulfeen M, Tatapudi R, Sowjanya R. Erratum to “IV labetalol and oral nifedipine in acute control of severe hypertension in pregnancy-A randomized controlled trial” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 236 (May) (2019) 46-52]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 247: 272.
  • 5.   Raheem I,Saaid R, Omar S, Tan P. Oran nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for acute blood pressure control in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2012;119:78 85. 59.
  • 6.   Vermilion ST, Scardo JA, Newman RB, Chauhan SP. A randomized, double blind trial of oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:858-61.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval

Acknowledgements

Information Not Provided


About this article


Cite this article

Oswal K, Sindoor UM. A randomized trial of intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine in acute blood pressure control in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;12(1):27-30.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Received Accepted Published
February 28, 2024 March 28, 2024 March 29, 2024

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijog.2321.1636.12124.5

Keywords

Intravenous labetalolOral nifedipineHypertensive emergencies

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 28 February 2026, 11:31:43 (IST)


419

Accesses

0
113
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 28, 2024
Accepted March 28, 2024
Published March 29, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Access this article



Share