Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Comparitive Study of Laparoscopic vs. Open Peptic Perforation Closure

Kishan R. Katua , Viral G. Sangani1 , Kishan R. Katua2 , Mehul M. Tadvi3 , Jignesh N. Mahida4 , Mohit Chauhan5 , Sagar V. Katudiya6

Author Information

Licence:




New Indian Journal of Surgery 10(2):p 220-224, March-April 2019. | DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.10219.15

How Cite This Article:


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

 The objective of this study was to find the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in case of peptic perforation. A study was carried out with 40 patients with peptic perforation closure done in G.G hospital, Jamnagar during period of January 2016 to august 2018 and there was a significant difference in the outcome of the patients of these two groups, which established laparoscopic surgery as preferred method over open surgery for peptic ulcer perforation closure in way of lesser days antibiotic requirement (3.2 ± 0.41 SD days vs 9.1 ± 2.14 SD days), lesser analgesic requirement (2.2 ± 0.83 SD vs 6.9 ± 0.78 SD days), lesser post-operative hospital stay (4.5 ± 0.51 SD days vs 9.2 ± 2.89 SD days) and early return to normal routine activity(5.0 ± 0.72 SD vs 7.5 ± 1.53 SD days) in selected patients. 3

Keywords: Peptic ulcer perforation- Laparoscopic repair - Open repair


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.10219.15

Keywords


Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 30 July 2026, 01:38:08 (IST)


3367

Accesses

3
295
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share