Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Sociology of Pain for Physiotherapists

Dibyendunarayan Bid

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Journal of Social Welfare and Management 16(3):p 135-143, September - December 2024. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jswm.0975.0231.16324.4

How Cite This Article:

Bid D. Sociology of pain for physiotherapists. J Soc Welfare Manag. 2024;16(3):135-43.

Timeline

Received : October 21, 2024         Accepted : December 23, 2024          Published : December 29, 2024

Abstract

Background: Pain is increasingly recognized as a complex experience influenced by physical, psychological, and social factors. Traditional biomedical models of pain often overlook sociocultural dimensions that are critical for a holistic understanding, especially in fields like physiotherapy. Objective: This review aims to explore the sociological dimensions of pain and their implications for physiotherapy practice, emphasizing the need for a biopsychosocial approach to pain management. Methods: A narrative review approach was used to analyze literature on sociocultural influences on pain, focusing on aspects such as cultural norms, gender roles, and social support networks, as well as psychosocial factors like emotional responses and coping mechanisms. Findings: he review highlights how cultural norms shape pain perception and communication, how gender influences both pain expression and treatment biases and how social support impacts pain management outcomes. Additionally, psychosocial factors— including cognitive attention, emotional responses, and coping strategies—are essential in modulating the pain experience. Implications: For physiotherapists, understanding these sociocultural influences is crucial for delivering patient-centered care. Incorporating cultural competency, gender sensitivity, and psychosocial evaluation into practice can enhance treatment outcomes and improve patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Adopting a biopsychosocial approach allows physiotherapists to provide more effective and equitable care, ultimately promoting a comprehensive understanding of pain. Future research and professional development in these areas are recommended to further advance physiotherapy practice.


References

  • 1.   Ng W, Slater H, Starcevich C, Wright A, Mitchell T, Beales D. Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Pain. 2021;162(8):2154-85.
  • 2.   van Dijk H, Köke AJA, Elbers S, Mollema J, Smeets RJEM, Wittink H. Physiotherapists Using the Biopsychosocial Model for Chronic Pain: Barriers and Facilitators—A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(2):1634.
  • 3.   Holopainen R, Simpson P, Piirainen A, Karppinen J, Schütze R, Smith A, et al. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Pain. 2020;161(6).
  • 4.   Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161(9):1976-82.
  • 5.   Sluka KA, George SZ. A New Definition of Pain: Update and Implications for Physical Therapist Practice and Rehabilitation Science. Physical therapy. 2021;101(4).
  • 6.   Yoshikawa K, Brady B, Perry MA, Devan H. Sociocultural factors influencing physiotherapy management in culturally and linguistically diverse people with persistent pain: a scoping review. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:292-305.
  • 7.   Dillon M, Olson R, Mescouto K, Costa N, Setchell J. How physiotherapists attend to the human aspects of care when working with people with low back pain: a thematic analysis. Health Sociology Review. 2023;32(3):277-93.
  • 8.   Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan J, Briggs M. Rethinking pain education from the perspectives of people experiencing pain: a meta-ethnography to inform physiotherapy training. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e046363.
  • 9.   Arnaudo E. Pain and dualism: Which dualism? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2017;23(5):1081-6.
  • 10.   Duncan G. Mind-Body Dualism and the Biopsychosocial Model of Pain: What Did Descartes Really Say? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 2000;25(4):485-513.
  • 11.   Goldberg JS. Revisiting the Cartesian model of pain. Medical Hypotheses. 2008;70(5):1029-33.
  • 12.   Gagliese L, Katz J. Medically Unexplained Pain Is Not Caused by Psychopathology. Pain Research and Management. 2000;5(4):701397.
  • 13.   Stilwell P, Harman K. An enactive approach to pain: beyond the biopsychosocial model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2019;18(4):637-65.
  • 14.   Cholewicki J, Pathak PK, Reeves NP, Popovich JM. Model Simulations Challenge Reductionist Research Approaches to Studying Chronic Low Back Pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019;49(6):477-81.
  • 15.   Schneider F, Karoly P. Conceptions of the pain experience: The emergence of multidimensional models and their implications for contemporary clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review. 1983;3(1):61-86.
  • 16.   Adler RH. Engel’s biopsychosocial model is still relevant today. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2009;67(6):607-11.
  • 17.   Saxena A, Paredes-Echeverri S, Michaelis R, Popkirov S, Perez DL. Using the Biopsychosocial Model to Guide Patient-Centered Neurological Treatments. Semin Neurol. 2022;42(02):080-7.
  • 18.   Bolton D. Looking forward to a decade of the biopsychosocial model. BJPsych Bulletin. 2022;46(4):228-32.
  • 19.   Katz J, Rosenbloom BN. The Golden Anniversary of Melzack and Wall’S Gate Control Theory of Pain: Celebrating 50 Years of Pain Research and Management. Pain Research and Management. 2015;20(6):865487.
  • 20.   Moayedi M, Davis KD. Theories of pain: from specificity to gate control. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2013;109(1):5-12.
  • 21.   Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014;155(2):210-6.
  • 22.   Weissman DE, Gordon D, Bidar-Sielaff S. Cultural Aspects of Pain Management. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2004;7(5):715-7.
  • 23.   Davidhizar R, Giger JN. A review of the literature on care of clients in pain who are culturally diverse. International Nursing Review. 2004;51(1):47-55.
  • 24.   Lovering S. Cultural Attitudes and Beliefs About Pain. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2006;17(4):389-95.
  • 25.   Lasch KE. Culture, pain, and culturally sensitive pain care. Pain Management Nursing. 2000;1(3):16 22.
  • 26.   Peacock S, Patel S. Cultural Influences on Pain. Reviews in Pain. 2008;1(2):6-9.
  • 27.   Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA, Dion D, Dupuis G, Choinière M. A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? Pain. 2012;153(3).
  • 28.   Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;111(1):52-8.
  • 29.   Vallerand AH. Gender Differences in Pain. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1995;27(3):235 7.
  • 30.   Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. “Brave men” and “emotional women”: A literature review on gendered norms towards patients with pain. European Journal of Public Health. 2019;29(Supplement_4).
  • 31.   Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. “Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Research and Management. 2018;2018(1):6358624.
  • 32.   Robinson ME, Riley JL, III, Myers CD, Papas RK, Wise EA, Waxenberg LB, et al. Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to sex differences in pain. The journal of pain. 2001;2(5):251-7.
  • 33.   Stålnacke B-M, Haukenes I, Lehti A, Fjellman Wiklund A, Wiklund M, Hammarström A. Is there a gender bias in recommendations for further rehabilitation in primary care of patients with chronic pain after an interdisciplinary team assessment? Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2015;47(4):365-71.
  • 34.   Stenberg G, Ahlgren C. A gender perspective on physiotherapy treatment in patients with neck and back pain. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2010;12(1):35-41.
  • 35.   Orlas CP, Herrera-Escobar JP, Hau KM, Velmahos A, Patel N, Sanchez S, et al. Perceived social support is strongly associated with recovery after injury. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2021;91(3):552-8.
  • 36.   Mitchinson AR, Kim HM, Geisser M, Rosenberg JM, Hinshaw DB. Social Connectedness and Patient Recovery after Major Operations. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008;206(2):292-300.
  • 37.   Atkins N, Mukhida K. The relationship between patients’ income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Pain. 2022;6(1):142-70.
  • 38.   Craig KD, Holmes C, Hudspith M, Moor G, Moosa-Mitha M, Varcoe C, et al. Pain in persons who are marginalized by social conditions. Pain. 2020;161(2):261-5.
  • 39.   Maly A, Vallerand AH. Neighborhood, Socioeconomic, and Racial Influence on Chronic Pain. Pain Management Nursing. 2018;19(1):14-22.
  • 40.   Bannon S, Greenberg J, Mace RA, Locascio JJ, Vranceanu A-M. The role of social isolation in physical and emotional outcomes among patients with chronic pain. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2021;69:50-4.
  • 41.   Baker T, Taylor RJ, Taylor HO, Chatters LM, Engel IJ. The Intersection of Pain Outcomes and Social Isolation Among African Americans. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2022;9(5):1905 11.
  • 42.   Allen SF, Gilbody S, Atkin K, van der Feltz Cornelis C. The associations between loneliness, social exclusion and pain in the general population: A N=502,528 cross-sectional UK Biobank study. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2020;130:68-74.
  • 43.   Diotaiuti P, Corrado S, Mancone S, Falese L, Rodio A, Siqueira TC, et al. Influence of Cognitive Orientation and Attentional Focus on Pain Perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(13):7176.
  • 44.   Wiech K, Ploner M, Tracey I. Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008;12(8):306-13.
  • 45.   Silva Guerrero AV, Maujean A, Campbell L, Sterling M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered by Physiotherapists on Pain, Disability and Psychological Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions. The Clinical journal of pain. 2018;34(9):838-57.
  • 46.   Li W, Liu P, Hu Y, Meng J. Pain Modulates Responses to Emotional Stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11.
  • 47.   Price DD. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms of the Affective Dimension of Pain. Science. 2000;288(5472):1769-72.
  • 48.   Moffett J, McLean S. The role of physiotherapy in the management of non-specific back pain and neck pain. Rheumatology. 2005;45(4):371-8.
  • 49.   Pichonnaz C, Ancey C, Mbarga J, Foley R-A. Patients’ expectations of physiotherapists before and after an intensive chronic low back pain rehabilitation programme: a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews and observations. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2024;46(9):1776-86.
  • 50.   McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ. Does chronic pain predict future psychological distress? Pain. 2002;96(3):239-45.
  • 51.   Amaro-Díaz L, Montoro CI, Fischer-Jbali LR, Galvez-Sánchez CM. Chronic Pain and Emotional Stroop: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(12):3259.
  • 52.   Fernandez E, Turk DC. The utility of cognitive coping strategies for altering pain perception: a meta-analysis. Pain. 1989;38(2):123-35.
  • 53.   Zangoni G, Thomson OP. ‘I need to do another course’ - Italian physiotherapists’ knowledge and beliefs when assessing psychosocial factors in patients presenting with chronic low back pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2017;27:71-7.
  • 54.   Driver C, Oprescu F, Lovell GP. Exploring physiotherapists’ considerations regarding the use of psychosocial strategies in practice. Physiotherapy Research International. 2019;24(4):e1783.
  • 55.   Booker SS, Herr K. The State-of-“Cultural Validity” of Self-Report Pain Assessment Tools in Diverse Older Adults. Pain Medicine. 2015;16(2):232-9.
  • 56.   Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain. 1996;65(2):123-67.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval

Acknowledgements

Information Not Provided

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Bid D. Sociology of pain for physiotherapists. J Soc Welfare Manag. 2024;16(3):135-43.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Received Accepted Published
October 21, 2024 December 23, 2024 December 29, 2024

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jswm.0975.0231.16324.4

Keywords

Pain managementBiopsychosocial modelPhysiotherapyPsychosocial factorsChronic painBiopsychosocial modelPhysiotherapyPsychosocial factorsChronic pain

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 07 July 2026, 08:30:21 (IST)


1164

Accesses

1
112
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 21, 2024
Accepted December 23, 2024
Published December 29, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. 


Access this article



Share