Abstract

The Government of the Indonesian State protects the entire Indonesian nation and all of Indonesia's bloodshed, which is manifested through development carried out in all fields, both in the economic, social, cultural, defense and security fields. Procurement of government goods and services is a very important requirement. This study aims to analyze and find the ideal concept of the authority to implement contracts for the procurement of goods/services. The research method used is sociological juridical. The results of the study found that the regulations on the authority to implement contracts for the procurement of goods/services by budget user powers have not been based on the value of justice, namely Article 9 Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Regulations President Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services does not explicitly state the nature of the delegation of authority. Goods/services Procurement Policy Institute. The government should apply cognitive technology in the procurement of government goods/ services so that there is integration of planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation information systems for procurement with other systems in the procurement ecosystem. budget, namely making changes to the provisions of Article 9 Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services.

• 1.   Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2018 on Government Procurement
• 2.   Amiruddin, Korupsi Dalam Pengadaan BarangdanJasa, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2010, p. 47.
• 3.   Mukti Fajar. Dualism of Normative and Empirical Legal Research. Yogyakarta: Student Library. 2010. Anis Mashdurohatun, Gunarto & Oktavianto Setyo Nugroho Concept of Appraisal Institutions in Assessing The Valuation of Intangible Assets on Small Medium Enterprises Intellectual Property As Object of Credit Guarantee to Improve ommunity's Creative Economy, JPH: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume 8, Number 3, December 2021. See too Ardianita Wirianistiati, Sadjijono, Legal Consequences of Name-changing
• 4.   Agus Salim, Teoridan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial, Dari Denzin Gubadan Penerapannya, (Yogyakarta: Tiarawacana Yogya, 2001), p. 33- 34. See too Erlyn Indarti, Orasi Ilmiah: Menjadi Manusia Merdeka: Menggagas Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Hukumuntuk Membangun Masyarakat Madani, Sumber Gubadan Lincoln, p. 24.
• 5.   Maniah; Bin Bon, Abdul Talib; Hariadi, Andi Kahar; Gunarto; Mashdurohatun, Anis; et al. Mapping the Competencies and Training Needs of Human Resources to Improve Employee Performance in Indonesia After the Covid-19 Pandemic, Quality - Access to Success, 2023, 24(195), pp. 219–225.
• 6.   Nasucha, Chaizi. 2004. Reformasi Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: Grasindo
• 7.   Richo Andi Wibowo, Mencegah Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Jasa (Apa yang Sudahdan yang Masih Harus Dilakukan?), Jurnal Integritas, Volume 1 Nomor 1 – November 2015
• 8.   Saaefullah, Djadja. 2007. Pemikiran Kontemporer Administrasi Publik. Bandung: LP3N FISIP UNPAD
• 9.   Adrian Sutedi, Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barangdan Jasadan Berbagai Permasalahannya, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008, p.6-8
• 10.   Ibnu Syamsi, Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Keuangan Negara, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1994, p.85
• 11.   Mardiasmo, Perpajakan, Edisi Revisi, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta, 2011,p. 1
• 12.   Sadono Sukirno, Makroekonomi Teori Pengantar, Edisi Ketiga, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012, p. 168
• 13.   Chabib Solehdan Heru Rochmansjah, Pengelolaan Keuangandan Aset Daerah, Fokus Media, Jakarta, 2010,p. l 25.
• 14.   Black, Henry Campbell. 1990. Black’S Law Dictionary. West Publishing, p. 133
• 15.   Philipus Mandiri Hadjon, Discretionary Power dan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB), Paper, disampaikanpada Seminar nasional “Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Kebijakan Publik Dari Tindak Pidana Konsep”, Semarang 6-7 Mei 2004.
• 16.   Ibid
• 17.   Hans Kelsen. 2013. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media
• 18.   Nur Basuki Minanrno. 2009. Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Palangkaray: Laksbang Mediatama.
• 19.   Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, PrinsipIzin Usaha Industri di Indonesia, Disertasi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2004
• 20.   Helmi, Hukum Perizinan Lingkungan Hidup, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013, p. 286.
• 21.   Ibid., p 287.
• 22.   Siti Malikhatun Badriyah, Penemuan Hukum Dalam Konteks Pencarian Keadilan, Cetakan Kesatu, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2010, p. 1.
• 23.   Ibid., p. 3.
• 24.   Ibid.
• 25.   Jazim Hamidi, Optik Hukum, Peraturan Daerah Bermasalah, Menggagas Peraturan Daerah yang Responsifdan Berkesinambungan, Cetakan Pertama, Prestasi Pustaka Publisher, Jakarta, 2011, p. 139
• 26.   Ibid, p. 79.
• 27.   Ibid., p. 73-74.
• 28.   Munir Fuady, Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechstaat), Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2009, p. 9..
• 29.   Munir Fuady. 2013, Teori-teori Besar (Grand Theory) dalam Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, p. 41
• 30.   Sarja, 2016, Negara Hukum Teori Dan Praktek, Thafamedia, Yogyakarta, p. 67-68.
• 31.   Ibid, p. 68-69.
• 32.   Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, 2013, Prinsip-Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Indonesia, UNDIP, Semarang, p. 68.
• 33.   Barda Nawari Arief, 1984, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakandan Pengembangan Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, p. 125.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding