Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Failures in Digital Impression Technique

Balaji S B, Arjun S L, Ponsekar Abraham A

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Dental Education 17(4):p 187-192, Oct-Dec 2024. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijde.0974.6099.17424.4

How Cite This Article:

Balaji S B, Arjun S L, Ponsekar Abraham A. Failures in Digital Impression Techniqu. Ind J Dent Educ. 2024;17(4):187-192.

Timeline

Received : December 06, 2024         Accepted : November 08, 2024          Published : December 10, 2024

Abstract

A digital impression technique has revolutionized dental diagnostics and restorations by offering enhanced precision, faster workflow and improved patient comfort. However like any technological advancements it is not immune to challenges. Failures in digital impression techniques can arise due to various factors including operator error, equipment malfunction, inadequate scan data, etc. These failures can result in inadequate impression, poor fit of restoration, delay in treatment. This abstract explores the common causes of failure in digital impression techniques, including issues related to scanning protocols, patientrelated factors (such as motion or anatomy), and technical limitations of the equipment used. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of proper training, calibration, and troubleshooting to mitigate these issues and enhance the reliability of digital impressions. Understanding these failure points is crucial for dental professionals to optimize the use of digital technologies and ensure optimal patient outcomes.


References

  • 1.   Gonzalez, S., et al. (2019). Clinical applications and challenges of digital impression techniques in dentistry. Journal of Prosthodontics.
  • 2.   Joda, T., et al. (2015). Digital impressions in implant dentistry. Journal of Prosthodontic.
  • 3.   Patel, S., et al. (2015). “A review of the current status of digital impression techniques in dentistry.” Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 59(3), 116-124.
  • 4.   Chia, M., et al. (2020). “Impact of intraoral scanner resolution on the accuracy of digital impressions in restorative dentistry.” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 123(4), 508-514.
  • 5.   Barrett, E. J., et al. (2019). “The effect of image resolution on the accuracy of digital impressions for full arch restorations.” Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 30(4), 78-85.
  • 6.   Baker, S. L., et al. (2017). “The influence of environmental conditions on the performance of digital impression systems.” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117(6), 764-771.
  • 7.   Chia, M., et al. (2020). “Environmental factors affecting the accuracy of digital impression systems.” International Journal of Prosthodontics, 33(2), 204-210.
  • 8.   Nguyen, H. H., et al. (2018). “Effect of temperature and humidity on the dimensional accuracy of intraoral digital impressions.” Journal of Dental Research, 97(1), 47-52.
  • 9.   Arnal, M., et al. (2022). “Impact of environmental factors on the precision of intraoral scanners in dental applications.” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 34(5), 569-576.
  • 10.   Patel, S., et al. (2015). “A review of the current status of digital impression techniques in dentistry.” Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 59(3), 116-124.
  • 11.   Chia, M., et al. (2020). “Impact of intraoral scanner resolution on the accuracy of digital impressions in restorative dentistry.” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 123(4), 508-514.
  • 12.   Baker, S. L., et al. (2017). “The influence of environmental conditions on the performance of digital impression systems.” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117(6), 764-771.
  • 13.   Chia, M., et al. (2020). “Environmental factors affecting the accuracy of digital impression systems.” International Journal of Prosthodontics, 33(2), 204-210.
  • 14.   Nguyen, H. H., et al. (2018). “Effect of temperature and humidity on the dimensional accuracy of intraoral digital impressions.” Journal of Dental Research, 97(1), 47-52.
  • 15.   Arnal, M., et al. (2022). “Impact of environmental factors on the precision of intraoral scanners in dental applications.” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 34(5), 569-576.
  • 16.   Gracis, S. E., et al. (2017). “Patient-related factors influencing the success of intraoral scanning in digital impressions.” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 118(2), 178-182.
  • 17.   Sulaiman, T. A., et al. (2020). “Challenges and limitations in digital impression techniques: A clinical perspective.” Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 31(2), 89-94. 18.Chia, M., et al. (2019). “Patient discomfort and the accuracy of intraoral digital.
  • 18.   impressions in restorative dentistry.” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 31(5), 451-458.
  • 19.   19.Hassan, B., et al. (2018). “Impact of patient cooperation on the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions.” Journal of Prosthodontics, 27(8), 747-752.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

Information not provide.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Balaji S B, Arjun S L, Ponsekar Abraham A. Failures in Digital Impression Techniqu. Ind J Dent Educ. 2024;17(4):187-192.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
December 06, 2024 November 08, 2024 December 10, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijde.0974.6099.17424.4

Keywords

Digital impressionFailureAccuracyDental technologyScanning errorsPatient movementEquipment calibrationTreatment outcomesDental impressions

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Sunday 21 June 2026, 13:43:30 (IST)


1388

Accesses

11
440
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received December 06, 2024
Accepted November 08, 2024
Published December 10, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share