Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Clinical Study of Epidural Nalbuphine vs Tramadol for Postoperative Pain Relief in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries

Deepa Gautham , Uma G , Deepa Gautham , S Sathyanarayanan

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 7(2):p 578-583, Mar-Apr 2020. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.20

How Cite This Article:

 

Uma G, Deepa Gautham, S. Sathyanarayanan. Clinical Study of Epidural Nalbuphine vs Tramadol for Postoperative Pain Relief
in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(2):578–583.


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Context: Achieving satisfactory postoperative analgesia with epidural opioids has been the subject of research many times. Aims: To evaluate postoperative pain relief in patients administered with epidural nalbuphine or tramadol for lower-limb surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Settings: Tertiary hospital, Kanchipuram Dist, Tamil Nadu. Design:Prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: The study was done on patients undergoing lower-limb orthopedic procedures. The patients were assigned to either epidural nalbuphine (N) Group or epidural tramadol (T) Group. The convenience sampling technique was used until each group had 40 subjects. Group N received epidural 0.125 % bupivacaine with nalbuphine 0.2 mg/ml infusion@6ml/hr and Group T with epidural 0.125 % bupivacaine with tramadol2mg/ml infusion@6ml/hr started at sensory regression to T10 for postop analgesia. The pain severity was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and sedation was assessed using Pasero Opioid-induced Sedation Scale (POSS). Intravenous paracetamol was used as rescue medication. Statistical analysis used: Chi-square test and unpaired t-test. Results: The mean sedation at 2 hrs was 1.65 ± 0.8 in tramadol and 2.8 ± 0.41 in the nalbuphine group. The difference was statistically significant (p - value < 0.001). The mean VAS at 12 hrs was 1.06 ± 0.4 in tramadol and 1.26 ± 0.44 in nalbuphine. At 24 hrs it was 0.86 ± 0.41 in tramadol and 1.05 ± 0.34 in nalbuphine group, with statistically significant differences (p - value < 0.05). In the tramadol group, 5 (12.5%) had vomiting and 6 (15%) were administered with IV
paracetamol. Conclusions: Nalbuphine was more effective in providing postoperative pain relief compared to Tramadol. Tramadol was associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

 

Uma G, Deepa Gautham, S. Sathyanarayanan. Clinical Study of Epidural Nalbuphine vs Tramadol for Postoperative Pain Relief
in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(2):578–583.


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.20

Keywords

Nalbuphine; Tramadol; Postoperative Analgesia; Sedation; Nausea; VAS.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 07 February 2026, 21:04:57 (IST)


1189

Accesses

0
194
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share