Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Characterization and Forensic Significance of X-STRs in Mutated Autosomal STR Markers of Paternity Cases

R.K. Kumawat, Muskan Singhal, Umema Ahmed, S.S. Daga, Prati bha

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Clinical Forensic Sciences 01(01):p 25-31, JAN-JUN 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jcfs.3107.6874.1123.3

How Cite This Article:

R.K. Kumawat, Muskan Singhal, Umema Ahmed, et al./Characterization and Forensic Significance of X-STRs in Mutated Autosomal STR Markers of Paternity Cases. Jr of Clin Forensic Sci. 2023;1(1):25–31

Timeline

Received : October 25, 2022         Accepted : November 28, 2022          Published : June 30, 2023

Abstract

Genetic markers can be defined as the sequence of DNA that has a known physical location on the chromosome. Generally, markers help to link the inherited disease with the responsible gene. In forensics, Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are most commonly used gold standard markers that consist of repeated 2-10 base pair units. Now days, in paternity cases 20 or more autosomal STR markers are using to establish paternity or other forensic application. It is reported in many cases one or two autosomal markers of the offspring's DNA profile show different alleles which are not present in their parent's DNA profile. This might be possible due to mutation or incest paternity cases. Therefore, to confirm mutation or support to establish paternity in such cases, lineage markers viz. Y-STRs, X-STRs, and Mt. DNA are potential tools. In this article, the characterization and forensic significance of X-STRs in mutated autosomal markers of two paternity cases were discussed. X- STRs of X-chromosomes show their unique pattern of inheritance than other autosomal STRs. The X chromosome is inherited in the offspring from father and mother both. The X chromosome is inherited from mother to daughter and son; and from father to daughter only. X-STR are used to decode genetic structure in respect to the cases like parentage, human identification, kinship, and disease identification. In this paper, significant role of X-chromosomal STR analysis in mutated autosomal STRs especially in paternity cases has been discussed.


References

  • 1.   Liu, L., Yuan, J., Miao, L., Huang, R., Zhang, X., Nie, S., & Hu, L. (2022). Genetic polymorphisms of 16 X-STR loci were analyzed in the Han population of Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Legal Medicine, 54, 101974.
  • 2.   Ferragut, J. F., Bentayebi, K., Barbaro, A., Ramírez, M., Saguillo, A. Y., Ramon, C., &Picornell, A. (2021). Exploring the Western Mediterranean through X-chromosome. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 135(3), 787-790.
  • 3.   Pereira, V., & Gusmão, L. (2021). The X-Chromosomal STRs in Forensic Genetics: X Chromosome STRs. In Forensic DNA Analysis (pp. 91-111). Apple Academic Press.
  • 4.   Szibor, R., Edelmann, J., Hering, S., Plate, I., Wittig, H., Roewer, L., ...& Michael, M. (2003). Cell line DNA typing in forensic genetics—the necessity of reliable standards. Forensic science international, 138(1-3), 37-43.
  • 5.   Kayser, M., & De Knijff, P. (2011). Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(3), 179-192.
  • 6.   Wyner, N., Barash, M., &McNevin, D. (2020). Forensic Autosomal Short Tandem Repeats and Their Potential Association With Phenotype. Frontiers in genetics, 11, 884.
  • 7.   Schneider, P. M., Prainsack, B., &Kayser, M. (2019). The use of forensic DNA phenotyping in predicting appearance and biogeographic ancestry. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 116(51-52), 873.
  • 8.   Kling, D., Egeland, T., &Tillmar, A. O. (2012). FamLink–a user-friendly software for linkage calculations in family genetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6(5), 616-620.
  • 9.   Mansour, H., Krebs, O., Sperhake, J. P., Augustin, C., Koehne, T., Amling, M., &Püschel, K. (2018). Cementum as a source of DNA in challenging forensic cases. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 54, 76-81.
  • 10.   Martins, J. A., Kawamura, B., Cardoso, A. E., &Cicarelli, R. M. B. (2014). Brazilian genetic database of chromosome X. Molecular biology reports, 41(6), 4077-4080.
  • 11.   Matise, T. C., Chen, F., Chen, W., Francisco, M., Hansen, M., He, C., ...& Buyske, S. (2007). A secondgeneration combined linkage–physical map of the human genome. Genome Research, 17(12), 1783-1786.
  • 12.   Scherer, M., König, M., Bussmann, M., Prochnow, A., & Peist, R. (2015). Development and validation of the new Investigator® Argus X-12 QS Kit. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 5, e256-e257.
  • 13.   Barrio, P. A., Crespillo, M., Luque, J. A., Aler, M., Baeza-Richer, C., Baldassarri, L., ...&Vannelli, S. (2018). GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: results and evaluation. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 35, 156-163.
  • 14.   Xiao, C., Li, S., Zhang, X., Yang, X., Liu, C., & Chen, L. (2020). Population genetic analysis of Chinese Zhuang and Mulao minorities using AGCU-X19 STR kit. International journal of legal medicine, 134(2), 501-503.
  • 15.   Yang, X., Wu, W., Chen, L., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Chen, & Liu, C. (2016). Development of the 19 X-STR loci multiplex system and genetic analysis of a Zhejiang Han population in China. Electrophoresis, 37(15-16), 2260-227.
  • 16.   Gao, H., Wang, C., Zhang, R., Wu, H., Sun, S., Xiao, D., ...& Zhang, M. (2019). Application of CPI cutoff value based on parentage testing of duos and trios typed by four autosomal kits. PloS one, 14(11), e0225174.
  • 17.   Moretto, M. D. (2019). Improving resolution of mixtures by DNA sequencing using the IlluminaMiSeqFGx system (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University).

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

R.K. Kumawat, Muskan Singhal, Umema Ahmed, et al./Characterization and Forensic Significance of X-STRs in Mutated Autosomal STR Markers of Paternity Cases. Jr of Clin Forensic Sci. 2023;1(1):25–31


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
October 25, 2022 November 28, 2022 June 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jcfs.3107.6874.1123.3

Keywords

X-STRsHuman IdentificationParentageKinshipForensic significance

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 07 July 2026, 05:21:07 (IST)


1562

Accesses

16
260
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 25, 2022
Accepted November 28, 2022
Published June 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share