Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Advancements in Sensor Technologies for Forensic Toxicology: Enlightens the Way for Future Toxic Detection

Suman Sangwan, Jasbir Lather, Sitaram null, Jyoti Malik, Diksha Thakur, Madhup Singh, Rinku null, Ajay Kumar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Forensic Chemistry and Toxicology 11(1):p 50-56, Jan-June 2025. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jfct.2454.9363.11125.6

How Cite This Article:

Suman Sangwan, Jasbir Lather, Sitaram et. al, Advancements in Sensor Technologies for Forensic Toxicology: Enlightens the Way for Future Toxic Detection.J Forensic Chemistry Toxicol. 2025; 11(1): 50–56.

Timeline

Received : May 09, 2025         Accepted : June 12, 2025          Published : June 30, 2025

Abstract

The evolution of sensor technologies has significantly impacted forensic toxicology, offers more efficient, sensitive, and precise means of detecting toxic substances in biological samples. This review critically examines the recent advancements in sensor techniques employed in forensic toxicology, focusing on their potential to improve the detection and identification of toxins, drugs, poisons, and other harmful substances in forensic investigations. From electrochemical sensors and biosensors to optical and mass spectrometric techniques, sensor-based technologies are enhancing the speed, accuracy, and accessibility of toxicological testing. This critical review paper explores the benefits, limitations, and future directions of these advanced sensor systems, highlighting their role in simplifying and accelerating toxicological analyses in both clinical and criminal investigations.


References

  • 1.   Arduini, F., et al. (2017). Electrochemical sensors as an innovative approach for clinical and forensic toxicology. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 97, 179-190.
  • 2.   Bahadir, E. B., & Sezgintürk, M. K. (2015). Applications of electrochemical biosensors to pharmaceuticals. Analytical Biochemistry, 478, 107-120.
  • 3.   Borkowska, E., & Kowalska, T. (2022). “AIPowered Toxicological Screening: A New Era in Forensic Investigations.” Forensic Science International, 314, 110380.
  • 4.   Britzi, M., Friedman, S., Miron, J., Solomon, R., Cuneah, O., Shimshoni, J. A., ... & Shlosberg, A. (2013). Carry-over of aflatoxin B1 to aflatoxin M1 in high yielding Israeli cows in mid-and late-lactation. Toxins, 5(1), 173-183.
  • 5.   Dhawan, D., & Garg, A. (2021). “Biosensors for Detection of Toxicological Agents in Forensic Investigations.” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 329, 129089.
  • 6.   Fan, X., et al. (2008). Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 620(1-2), 8-26.
  • 7.   Figueiredo, R., et al. (2016). Advances in mass spectrometry for forensic toxicology. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 85, 1-10.
  • 8.   Gao, A. (2024). Advances in biosensors for poison detection applications. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 553, p. 05002). EDP Sciences.
  • 9.   Johnson, P. E., & Miller, M. R. (2020). “Mass Spectrometry in Forensic Toxicology: Recent Advances in Sensor Applications.” Forensic Science International, 317, 110514.
  • 10.   Khan, R., Anwar, F., & Ghazali, F. M. (2024). A comprehensive review of mycotoxins: Toxicology, detection, and effective mitigation approaches. Heliyon.
  • 11.   Kumar R., Sheikh N., Bashar M., Vasudeva A., Kumar A., Yadav A., et al. (2023). Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. J. 12, 70.
  • 12.   Kumar, V., et al. (2019). “Biosensors in forensic toxicology: Current status and future trends.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
  • 13.   Ligler F. S., Taitt C. R., Shriver–Lake L. C., Sapsford K. E., Shubin Y. S., Golden J. P. (2003). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. J. 377, 469.
  • 14.   López, M., et al. (2020). “Advances in biosensor technologies for toxin detection.” Journal of Toxicology.
  • 15.   Parra, M., et al. (2020). “Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensors for Forensic Toxicology Applications.” Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 123, 115-123.
  • 16.   Ryan, M. A., & Smith, S. P. (2018). “Integrating AI and Mass Spectrometry in Forensic Toxicology.” Journal of Forensic Toxicology, 36(5), 204-210.
  • 17.   Smith, R. D. (2004). Advances in mass spectrometry instrumentation. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 1(1), 349-378.
  • 18.   Turner, A. P. F. (2013). Biosensors: Sense and sensibility. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(8), 3184-3196.
  • 19.   Ullah, M. F., Khan, Y., Khan, M. I., Abdullaeva, B. S., & Waqas, M. (2024). Exploring nanotechnology in forensic investigations: Techniques, innovations, and future prospects. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 100674.
  • 20.   Wang, J. (2005). Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21(10), 1887- 1892.
  • 21.   Xu, X., et al. (2019). Advances in fluorescencebased biosensors for food safety detection. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 240- 252.
  • 22.   Yáñez-Sedeño, P., Agüí, L., Villalonga, R., & Pingarrón, J. M. (2014). Biosensors in forensic analysis. A review. Analytica chimica acta, 823, 1-19.
  • 23.   Yang, L., et al. (2022). “Optical Sensing in Forensic Toxicology: A Review.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(2), 578-591.
  • 24.   Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). “Advances in Portable Sensors for Toxicological Analysis in Forensic Investigations.” Sensors, 19(24), 5478.
  • 25.   Zhu, Z., et al. (2021). “Deep Learning in Mass Spectrometry for Forensic Toxicology.” Nature Biotechnology, 39(8), 1052-1060.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Suman Sangwan, Jasbir Lather, Sitaram et. al, Advancements in Sensor Technologies for Forensic Toxicology: Enlightens the Way for Future Toxic Detection.J Forensic Chemistry Toxicol. 2025; 11(1): 50–56.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
May 09, 2025 June 12, 2025 June 30, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/jfct.2454.9363.11125.6

Keywords

Forensic ToxicologySensorsDiagnosis

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Sunday 18 October 2026, 15:05:04 (IST)


2006

Accesses

13
180
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received May 09, 2025
Accepted June 12, 2025
Published June 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share