2582-354X
Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Traditional Synchronicity – Syndrome is not Illness

T V Gopal,

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



RFP Indian Journal of Medical Psychiatry 9(2):p 60-68, July - Dec. 2026. | DOI: 10.21088/ijmp.2582.1415.9226.3

How Cite This Article:

T V Gopal. Traditional Synchronicity – Syndrome is not Illness. RFP Ind Jr of Med Psy. 2025; 9(2): 60-68.

Timeline

Received : April 17, 2026         Accepted : May 22, 2026          Published : December 30, 2026

Abstract

Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last great mind that looked out on the visible and intellectual world with the same eyes as those who began to build our intellectual inheritance rather less than 10000 years ago.” - John Maynard Keyes, Address to the Royal Society Club (1942), as quoted in A Dictionary of Scientific Quotations (1977) by Alan L. MacKay, p.140 The Age of Reason [Enlightenment] began in the late 17th-18th centuries as a direct, rational extension of the Scientific Revolution [roughly 1543–1687]. It started when methods like empirical observation and deductive reasoning, pioneered by eminent philosophers and people of science like Francis Bacon, Galileo, and Isaac Newton, were applied to society, politics, and religion, challenging traditional authority. At the core of this intellectual shift was the application of the cause-and-effect chain [or causal reasoning] to everything from physics to social structures, asserting that the universe operates according to natural laws rather than arbitrary miracles. However, the brain’s cause-and-effect reasoning often fails. Synchronicity is a concept introduced by Swiss psychologist Carl Jung that challenges the linear view of cause-and-effect [causality]. Synchronicity is a phenomenon in which people interpret two separate but seemingly unrelated experiences as being meaningfully intertwined. Generalizations are deductions about the nature of things, derived from examples and instances. That is an inductive step, and the process steps back from reality into a model of reality. Science attempts to coerce the relationships among various experiences into this model of reality. Synchronicity may lie in the liminal space between psychiatry and spirituality where joy can be found as coming from knowing, feeling, or doing that which matters most. People need to trust other kinds of knowledge, not only that of science, to stay in touch with reality. Poetry might matter more than physics, intuitions more than theories.


References

  • 1.   B Viswanathan, S Ram Mohan, Gopal T V and K Ramanakumar, “Mahaperiyava Commemorative Volume on “Facets of Consicousness”, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, Enathur, 2007
  • 2.   Bernard D. Beitman, “Psychology Influences the Perception of Synchronicity”, Psychology Today, November 3, 2023
  • 3.   Bernard D. Beitman, “When Symptoms Are Not Necessarily Signs of Illness: Rethinking Synchronicity in Psychiatry”, Psychiatric Times, October 23, 2025
  • 4.   Carl J Jung, [Translated by R. F. C. Hull], “synchronicity - An Acausal Connecting Principle”, In: Vol. 8 of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Bollingen Series, Princeton University Press, 1973 5. Gopal T V, “Hrishikesa: Krishna – A Natural Evolution”, Universal Publishers, USA, 2000.
  • 6.   Igor Micunovic, “Unveiling Synchronicity: Ancient Wisdom to Modern Science”, Wellness, 24 April 2024.
  • 7.   Musella G, Canfora F, Caponio VCA, Vardas E, Kouri M, Nikitakis N, Troiano G, Aria M, D’Aniello L, Lo Muzio L, Mignogna MD, Adamo D, “Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder, A Distinct Subset of Chronic Orofacial Pain Without Burning Symptoms: A Case-Control Study”, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp 651-666, 2025
  • 8.   Nachman, G, “Clinical Implications of Synchronicity and Related Phenomena”, Psychiatric Annals, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp 297–308, 2009
  • 9.   Peter J. Uhlhaas, Wolf Singer, “Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology”, Neuron, Vol. 52, Issue 1, pp155-168, 2006.
  • 10.   Silvia Ampollini, Martina Ardizzi, Francesca Ferroni, Ada Cigala, “Synchrony Perception Across Senses: A Systematic Review of Temporal Binding Window Changes from Infancy to Adolescence in Typical and Atypical Development”, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 162, Article No. 105711, 2024,
  • 11.   Solomon EA, Kragel JE, Sperling MR, Sharan A, Worrell G, Kucewicz M, Inman CS, Lega B, Davis KA, Stein JM, Jobst BC, Zaghloul KA, Sheth SA, Rizzuto DS, Kahana M, “Widespread Theta 1. Synchrony And High-Frequency Desynchronization Underlies Enhanced Cognition” , Nature Communications, Vol. 8, No. 1, Article No.1704, 2017.
  • 12.   Srila Bhakti Niskama Shanta Maharaja et al, [Editors], “Beyond Atoms and Algorithms – Reclaiming Epistemology through Vedanta in Dialogue with Science and Philosophy”, Second International Conference Dialogue between Vedanta & Science, December 5 – 6, 2025, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • 13.   Steven Moffic H, “Synchronicity and Psychiatry: An Ode to Joy!”, Psychiatric Times, October 13,

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

T V Gopal. Traditional Synchronicity – Syndrome is not Illness. RFP Ind Jr of Med Psy. 2025; 9(2): 60-68.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
April 17, 2026 May 22, 2026 December 30, 2026

DOI: 10.21088/ijmp.2582.1415.9226.3

Keywords

SynchronicitySyndromeIllnessMantrasSeerPoetSpirituality

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 11 November 2026, 03:09:09 (IST)


1515

Accesses

0
250
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received April 17, 2026
Accepted May 22, 2026
Published December 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share