Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

The Psychological Effect of Misinformation and Conspiracy Theories on Public Mental Health: A Qualitative Study

Bibhas Kumar Sinha

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 14(3):p 87-89, Sept- Dec. 2025. | DOI: 10.21088/jpn.2277.9035.14325.1

How Cite This Article:

Bibhas Kumar Sinha. The Psychological Effect of Misinformation and Conspiracy Theories on Public Mental Health: A Qualitative Study. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2025; 14(3): 87–89.

Timeline

Received : August 08, 2025         Accepted : September 27, 2025          Published : December 30, 2025

Abstract

This qualitative article explores the significant psychological effect of misinformation and conspiracy theories on individual mental health. Through a review of recent literature and thematic analysis, the study identifies critical areas of mental disturbance, including anxiety, distrust, paranoia, and Cognitive overload. It also addresses the social consequences of wide spread misinformation during global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The article offers evidence from internal case studies and scholarly sources to emphasize the Urgency of combating of misinformation through public education, media literacy, and psychological resilience programs.


References

  • 1.   Betsch, C., Wieler, L. H., Habersaat, K., & COSMO group (2020). Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19. The lancet, 395 (10232), 1255-1256.
  • 2.   Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26 (6), 538 – 542.
  • 3.   Freeman, D., waite, F., Rosebrock, L., et al. (2020). Coronavirus Conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 1-13.
  • 4.   Friggire, A., Adamic, L.A., Eekles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014). Rumor Cascades. In proceedings of the Eights International Conference on Weblogs and social media (ICWSM).
  • 5.   Gao, J., Zheng, P., Jia, Y., et al. (2020). Mental health problems and social media oxposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLOSONE, 15 (4), e 0231924.
  • 6.   Jolley, D., & Douglas, K.M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLOS ONE, 9 (2), e 89177.
  • 7.   Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K.H., Seiserst, C.M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the public interest, 13 (3), 106-131.
  • 8.   Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D.G. (2021), Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and implications, 6 (1), 1-20.
  • 9.   Pennycook, G., & Rand, D.G. (2019). The imlied truth effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of fake news stories increased perceived accuracy of stones without warnings. Management Science, 66 (11), 4944 – 4957.
  • 10.   Uscinski, J.E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M.D. (2020). What drives Conspirational beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 73 (3), 633-645.
  • 11.   Vosouighi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359 (6380), 1146-1159.
  • 12.   Verma, G., Bhardwaj, A., Aledavood, T., De Choudhury, M., & Kumar, S (2022). Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health. Scientific Reports, 12, 8045

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.


About this article


Cite this article

Bibhas Kumar Sinha. The Psychological Effect of Misinformation and Conspiracy Theories on Public Mental Health: A Qualitative Study. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2025; 14(3): 87–89.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
August 08, 2025 September 27, 2025 December 30, 2025

DOI: 10.21088/jpn.2277.9035.14325.1

Keywords

MisinformationFake NewsConspiracyTheoriesStressAnxietyPsychological ImpactMedia LiteracyA Qualitative Study

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 28 February 2026, 23:25:07 (IST)


154

Accesses

4
68
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received August 08, 2025
Accepted September 27, 2025
Published December 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share