Shweta Dwivedy, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra,, India
Tejas M. Kulkarni Associate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra,, India
Nivedita P. Tayde Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra,, India
Shreeja V. Pilla Assistant Professor, Department of Oral pathology and Microbiology, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra,, India
Address for correspondence: Shweta Dwivedy,, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra,, India E-mail: shwetapandit2514@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Shweta Dwivedy, Tejas M. Kulkarni, Nivedita P Tayde, et al. Reliability of Computer Assisted Method for Bite
Mark Analysis: A Narrative Review. Ind J Forensic Odontol 2025; 18(1): 23-27.
Timeline
Received : June 27, 2025
Accepted : July 29, 2025
Published : June 30, 2025
Abstract
Bite mark analysis is one of the fundamental characteristic of forensic odontology, aiding in the identification of perpetrators in crimes. Computer-assisted methods have emerged as a promising tool in bite mark analysis, offering improved accuracy and efficiency. This article aims to review the reliability of computerassisted methods for bite mark analysis. This review underscores the potential of computer-assisted methods in bite mark analysis, while emphasizing the need for further research to establish their reliability and validity. Ultimately, this review
aims to inform forensic practitioners, researchers, and policymakers about the current state of computer-assisted bite mark analysis and its potential applications in forensic science.
References
1. Hemalatha V.T., Manisundar N., Aarthi Nisha V., Sarumathi T. Identification of Bitemark Perpetrators in Forensic Dentistry: A Review.
2. Samarth Borker, Hiroj Naik, A Novel Approach based on Image Processing in the Analysis of Human Dental Forensic. International Journal of Computer Applications; 2014: 89(16).
3. Maloth S., Ganapathy K.S. Comparison Between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2011; 22(3): 493-505.
4. Yadav N., Srivastava P.C. Bite Marks: An Indispensible Forensic Odontological Evidence in Rape Cases J Indian Acad Forensic Med.
5. David R. Senn, Paul G. Stimson. Forensic Dentistry 2nd Edition, Boca Raton, FL, US, Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press; 2010.
6. Bhargava K. et al. An Overview of Bite mark Analysis. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2012; 34(1): 61-66.
7. Glenn Flora, Mihran Tuceryan, Herb Blitzer. Forensic Bite Mark Identification Using Image Processing Methods. SAC’09 March 8-12, 2009,
9. Sharma G. et al. Bite Mark Analysis: An Important Tool in Crime Investigation. JIAFM, 2006: 28 (2) ISSN: 0971-0973.
10. Mahajan A. et al. Role of Bitemark Analysis in Identification of a Person. GJMEDPH, 2012; 1(1).
11. B. Rai, J. Kaur, Evidence-based Forensic Dentistry, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.
12. A. van der Velden, M. Spiessens, G. Willems. Bite Mark Analysis And Comparison Using Image Perception Technology. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 2006; 24(!): 14-17.
13. Bowers C.M., Johansen R.J. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence. J Forensic Sci. 2002 Jan; 47(1): 178-85. PMID: 12064648.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Shweta Dwivedy, Tejas M. Kulkarni, Nivedita P Tayde, et al. Reliability of Computer Assisted Method for Bite
Mark Analysis: A Narrative Review. Ind J Forensic Odontol 2025; 18(1): 23-27.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.