Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Reliability of Computer Assisted Method for Bite Mark Analysis: A Narrative Review

Shweta Dwivedy,, Tejas M. Kulkarni, Nivedita P. Tayde, Shreeja V. Pilla

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Forensic Odontology 18(1):p 23-27, Jan- June 2025. | DOI: 10.21088/ijfo.0974.505X.18125.3

How Cite This Article:

Shweta Dwivedy, Tejas M. Kulkarni, Nivedita P Tayde, et al. Reliability of Computer Assisted Method for Bite Mark Analysis: A Narrative Review. Ind J Forensic Odontol 2025; 18(1): 23-27.

Timeline

Received : June 27, 2025         Accepted : July 29, 2025          Published : June 30, 2025

Abstract

Bite mark analysis is one of the fundamental characteristic of forensic odontology, aiding in the identification of perpetrators in crimes. Computer-assisted methods have emerged as a promising tool in bite mark analysis, offering improved accuracy and efficiency. This article aims to review the reliability of computerassisted methods for bite mark analysis. This review underscores the potential of computer-assisted methods in bite mark analysis, while emphasizing the need for further research to establish their reliability and validity. Ultimately, this review aims to inform forensic practitioners, researchers, and policymakers about the current state of computer-assisted bite mark analysis and its potential applications in forensic science.


References

  • 1.   Hemalatha V.T., Manisundar N., Aarthi Nisha V., Sarumathi T. Identification of Bitemark Perpetrators in Forensic Dentistry: A Review.
  • 2.   Samarth Borker, Hiroj Naik, A Novel Approach based on Image Processing in the Analysis of Human Dental Forensic. International Journal of Computer Applications; 2014: 89(16).
  • 3.   Maloth S., Ganapathy K.S. Comparison Between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2011; 22(3): 493-505.
  • 4.   Yadav N., Srivastava P.C. Bite Marks: An Indispensible Forensic Odontological Evidence in Rape Cases J Indian Acad Forensic Med.
  • 5.   David R. Senn, Paul G. Stimson. Forensic Dentistry 2nd Edition, Boca Raton, FL, US, Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press; 2010.
  • 6.   Bhargava K. et al. An Overview of Bite mark Analysis. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2012; 34(1): 61-66.
  • 7.   Glenn Flora, Mihran Tuceryan, Herb Blitzer. Forensic Bite Mark Identification Using Image Processing Methods. SAC’09 March 8-12, 2009,
  • 8.   Wagner G.N. Bitemark Identification: Pediatric Dentistry: 1986; 8(1); 96-100.
  • 9.   Sharma G. et al. Bite Mark Analysis: An Important Tool in Crime Investigation. JIAFM, 2006: 28 (2) ISSN: 0971-0973.
  • 10.   Mahajan A. et al. Role of Bitemark Analysis in Identification of a Person. GJMEDPH, 2012; 1(1).
  • 11.   B. Rai, J. Kaur, Evidence-based Forensic Dentistry, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.
  • 12.   A. van der Velden, M. Spiessens, G. Willems. Bite Mark Analysis And Comparison Using Image Perception Technology. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 2006; 24(!): 14-17.
  • 13.   Bowers C.M., Johansen R.J. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence. J Forensic Sci. 2002 Jan; 47(1): 178-85. PMID: 12064648.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.


About this article


Cite this article

Shweta Dwivedy, Tejas M. Kulkarni, Nivedita P Tayde, et al. Reliability of Computer Assisted Method for Bite Mark Analysis: A Narrative Review. Ind J Forensic Odontol 2025; 18(1): 23-27.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
June 27, 2025 July 29, 2025 June 30, 2025

DOI: 10.21088/ijfo.0974.505X.18125.3

Keywords

Bite mark analysisComputer-assisted methodsForensic odontology

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 28 February 2026, 11:04:20 (IST)


220

Accesses

4
52
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received June 27, 2025
Accepted July 29, 2025
Published June 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share