Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Impact of Rainfall Variability and Soil Characteristics on Rainfed Agricultural System in Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh

B.P. Bhaskar,, V. Ramamurthy

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Plant and Soil 11(2):p 51-64, July-December 2024. | DOI: 10.21088/ijps.2348.9677.11224.1

How Cite This Article:

Bhaskar BP, Ramamurthy V. Impact of Rainfall Variability and Soil Characteristics on Rainfed Agricultural System in Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Plant Soil. 2024;11(2):51-64.

Timeline

Received : November 28, 2024         Accepted : December 28, 2024          Published : December 31, 2024

Abstract

The Ananthapuramu district in Andhra Pradesh is predominantly characterized by dryland agriculture, primarily cultivating three key crops: groundnut, pigeon pea and cotton. This approach to farming often overlooks the land’s carrying capacity, which can result in soil degradation and a swift decline in soil fertility. The focus of soil fertility assessment and land management in this region is to analyze the soil resource database, identifying both biophysical constraints and opportunities to enhance agricultural productivity and soil health, particularly in the context of fluctuating rainfall patterns. This research employs an exploratory methodology, utilizing soil analytical data from the prevalent soil series. The weighted averages of each soil series were calculated, taking into account various pedogenic properties such as particle size distribution, pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon content, calcium carbonate levels, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable bases, base saturation, and soil depth. The soils in this area were typically featured clay-rich sub soils, particularly in granitic terrains, exhibiting slightly acidic to neutral pH levels, high cation exchange capacity, and gravelly profiles. However, these soils displayed poor structural stability and have low to moderate fertility indices, indicative of significant organic carbon depletion. The findings revealed a dichotomy in soil fertility across the research area, with some regions classified as high fertility and others as low. The latter included land units situated on steep slopes and lacking effective land management practices. Key limiting factors affecting soil fertility were texture, organic carbon content, cation exchange capacity, phosphorus, and total potassium levels. It is recommended that organic fertilizers can be applied to enhance the fertility of these farming areas.


References

  • 1.   Abbasi, M.K., Zafar. and M., Sultan, T. (2010) Changes in soil properties and microbial indices across various management sites in the mountain environments of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 41: 768-782.
  • 2.   Ahukaemere C., Osujieke D. and Ndukwu B. (2017). Horizon differences in micronutrient contents of soils of the coastal plain sands in Imo state, South-East Nigeria, micronutrient contents of pedons formed under coastal plain sands. Bulgar. J. Soil Sci. 2(2):112–122.
  • 3.   Bapuji Rao, B., Santhibhushan Chowdary, P., Sandeep, V. M., Pramod,V. P. and Rao, V. U. M. (2015) Spatial analysis of the sensitivity of wheat yields to temperature in India. Agric. For. Meteorol., 200: 192-202
  • 4.   Bayu, T., Li, F. (2020) Review on contribution of integrated soil fertility management for climate change mitigation and agricultural sustainability.
  • 5.   Bhaskar, B.P. and Ramamurthy, V. (2024). Agroecology for crop diversification: A case study from Anantapur district, Andhtra Pradesh. IJPS.2024; 11(1):23.DOI:http://dx.doi. org.10.21088/ijps.2438.9677.111243.
  • 6.   Bhaskar, B.P. and Nagaraju, M.S.S. (1998) Characterization of some salt affected soils occurring in Chitravati basin, Andhra Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Soc. Soil Sci.46(3):416-421.
  • 7.   Bhaskar, B.P., R.S. Reddy, R.S., Budihal, S.L., Chalia, O., Anantwar, S.C., Nasre, R.A., Arti Koyal, Cajbhiye, K.S. and Velayutham, M. (2000) Evaluation of sediment stratification and classification of alkali soils in the Chitravathi River Basin, Andhra Pradesh. Agropedology. 10:195-204.
  • 8.   Bhaskar, B.P., Sunil Maske. and Ramesh Kumar S.C. (2019). Appraisal of Land Resources to Assess Climate ChangeImpacts for Rainfed Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L) Production Potential in Pulivendula Tehsil, YSR Kadapa District,Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Plant Soil. 6(1):5-19
  • 10.   Buol, S .W., Sanchez,P.A., Cate Jr, R.B. and Granger, M.A!1974) Soil Fertility Capability Classification. Journal Series of The North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.; Paper No. 4324. NC State University pp 126-141.
  • 11.   Ditzler, C.A., Tugel, A.J. (2002)Soil quality field tools: Experiences of USDA-NRCS Soil Quality Institute.Agron. J. 94: 33-38.
  • 12.   FAO (1988). Soil and Plant Analys.Rome:FAO Soil Bulletin 38/1. P 241.
  • 13.   Gilman, G. P. (1983). Nutrient Availibility Inn Acid Clearing and Cultivation. Proceedings of The International Workshop on Soils Research to Resolve Selected Problems of Soils in The Tropics Townsville, Queensland Australia. 12-16 September p 189.
  • 14.   Gomes, F. P. (1985). Course in Experimental Statistics.(13th ed.). Pádua Dias: ESALQ/USP. (in Portuguese).
  • 15.   Haldar, A., Sahoo, A.K., Siladitya Bandyopadhyay, Krishnendu Das, Gangopadhyay, S.K. and Dwivedi, B.S. (2020). Comparison of different methods of electrical conductivity determination for assessment of salinity in soils of coastal region, West Bengal. International Journal of Chemical Studies. SP-9(1): 116-121.DOI: https:// doi.org/10.22271 /chemi.2021.v9.i1c.11453. 16. ICRISAT (2020). http://data.icrisat.org.
  • 17.   Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 498.
  • 18.   Johannes, A., Weisskopf, P., Schulin, R. And Boivin, P. (2017) To what extent do physical measurements match with visual evaluation of soil structure? Soil and Tillage Research, 173: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.06.00
  • 19.   Jones, E. J., Filippi, P., Wittig, R., Fajardo, M., Pino, V., and McBratney, A. B. (2021). Mapping soil slaking index and assessing the impact of management in a mixed agricultural landscape, SOIL, 7: 33–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7- 33-2021.
  • 20.   Kadiyala, M.D.M.; Nedumaran, S., Piara Singh, Chukka S., Mohammad A. I. and Bantilan, M.C.S. (2015). An integrated crop model and GIS decision support system for assisting agronomic decision making under climate change. Sci.Total Environ. 521-522:123134. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015. 03. 097.
  • 21.   L’hote, Y., Mahé, G., Somé, B. and Triboulet, J. P. (2002) Analysis of a Sahelian annual rainfall index from 1896 to 2000; the drought continues. Hydrolog. SCI. J. 47 (4): 563–572.
  • 22.   Larson, W. E. and Osborne, G.J.(1981). Tillage Accomplishments and Potential. In Predicting Tillage Effects on Soil Physical Properties and Processes. ASA Special Publ. No. 44.
  • 23.   Larson, W.E. and Pierce, F.J. (1991) Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World, International Board for Soil Research and Management, Bangkok, pp. 175-203.
  • 24.   Loveland, P. and Webb, J. (2003). Is there a critical level of organic matterin the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review, Soil Till.Res.2003; 70: 1–18.
  • 25.   Michler, J.D., Baylis, K., Arends-Kuenning, M. And Mazvimavi, K., (2019). Conservation agriculture and climate resilience. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 93, 148–169.
  • 26.   Nalina, C.N., Anilkumar, K.S., Shilpashree, K.G.,Narendrababu, B., Sudhir, K. And Natarajan, A. (2016) Inventory and mapping of land resources for land use planning through detail soil survey coupled with remote sensing and GIStechniques: a case study in Nagenahalli watershed, Doddaballapur Taluk, Bangalore rural district, India.Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6(8):314-331.
  • 27.   NBSS&LUP (2008). Soil Resource of Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. Technical report N0.1017.
  • 28.   Ophélie Sauzet, Alice Johannes, Cédric Deluz, Xavier Dupla, Adrien Matter, Philippe C. Baveye. and Pascal Boivin. (2024). The organic carbonto-clay ratio as an indicator of soilstructure vulnerability, a metric focused on the condition of soil structure. Soil Use Manage. 40:e13060. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/sum.13060 .
  • 29.   Pieri, C.J.M.G. (1992). Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in the West African Savannah. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • 30.   Piotrowska-Długosz, A. and Wilczewski, E. (2020). Influence of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) as catch crop cultivated for green manure on soil phosphorus and P-cycling enzyme activity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 66 (11): 1570–1582.
  • 31.   Poeplau, C. and Don, A. (2023). A simple soil organic carbon levelmetric beyond the organic carbon- to-clay ratio. Soil Use andManagement, 39: 1057–1067.
  • 32.   Prabhavati, K., Dasog G.S., Patilm P.L., Sahrawat, K.L. and Wani, S.P. (2015). Soil fertility mapping using GIS in three Agro-climatic zones of Belgaum district, Karnataka. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 63(2):173-180.
  • 33.   Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Clark, M., Gerber, J.S., Prishchepov, A.V. and Chatterjee, S. (2019). Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS One, 14 (5), e0217148.
  • 34.   Sağlam, M. And Dengiz, O. (2014). Distribution and evaluation of soil fertility based on Geostatistical approach in Bafra Deltaic Plain. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2): 186- 195.
  • 35.   Sardiana, I.K., Susila, D., Supadma, A.A. and Saifulloh, M. (2017). Soil Fertility Evaluation and Land Management of Dry land Farming at Tegallalang Sub-District, Gianyar Regency, Bali, Indonesia.The 5th Geoinformation Science Symposium. 2017 (GSS 2017) IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 98 012043 doi:10.1088/ 1755-1315/98/1/012043.
  • 36.   Shah, K.K., Modi, B., Pandey, H.P., Subedi, A., Aryal, G., Pandey, M., Shrestha, J. and Fahad, S. (2021). Diversified crop rotation: an approach for sustainable agriculture production. Adv. Agric. 2021; 1–9.
  • 37.   Soil Survey Division Staff. (2017). Soil Survey Manual. USDA. Agri hand b. NO. 18. pp1-587.
  • 38.   Soil Survey Staff. (2010) Keys to Soil Taxonomy (11th edn).Washington, DC: Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA), 346 p.
  • 39.   Srinivasan, R., Rajendra Hegde, Bhaskar, B.P., Srinivas, S., Niranjana, K.V. and Amar Suputra. (2020). Pedogenesis of sodic soils in Somavathi river basin of semiarid ecoregion Andhra Pradesh: A case study. Journal of soil salinity and water quality. 12(2):139-147.
  • 40.   Stomph, T., Dordas, C., Baranger, A., de Rijk, J., Dong, B., Evers, J., Gu, C., Li, L., Simon, J., Jensen, E.S., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, W.-P., Bedoussac, L. And van der Werf, W. (2020) Designing intercrops for high yield, yield stability and efficient use of resources: are there principles? Adv. Agron.160 (1), 1–50.
  • 41.   Troeh, F.R. and Thompson, L.M., (2005). Soils and Soil Fertility, 6th ed. Blackwell, Ames, Iowa.
  • 42.   Williams, A., Jordan, N.R., Smith, R.G., Hunter, M.C., Kammerer, M., Kane, D.A., Koide, R.T. and Davis, A.S. (2018). A regionally-adapted implementation of conservation agriculture delivers rapid improvements to soil properties associated with crop yield stability. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 8467.
  • 43.   Wilson, M. and Lovell, S., (2016). Agroforestry - the next step in sustainable and resilient agriculture. Sustainability 8 (6).

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to express thanks to field staff and Lab technical officers for their help in generation of both field and lab data used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.


About this article


Cite this article

Bhaskar BP, Ramamurthy V. Impact of Rainfall Variability and Soil Characteristics on Rainfed Agricultural System in Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Plant Soil. 2024;11(2):51-64.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
November 28, 2024 December 28, 2024 December 31, 2024

DOI: 10.21088/ijps.2348.9677.11224.1

Keywords

Soil fertilityRainfall variabilityDrylandAnanthapuramuSoil series

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 17 June 2026, 15:57:47 (IST)


349

Accesses

4
91
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received November 28, 2024
Accepted December 28, 2024
Published December 31, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share