Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Good Governance for Quality Higher Education

Gedam. Kamalakar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


International Journal of Political Science 9(1):p 17-23, January-June 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/IJOPS.2454.9371.9123.2

How Cite This Article:

Gedam. Kamalakar/Good Governance for Quality Higher Education/International Journal of Political Science 2023;9(1):17–23.

Timeline

Received : November 09, 2022         Accepted : December 20, 2022          Published : June 30, 2023

Abstract

This paper made a study on academic leadership and found that leadership in academically poses problems that are noticeably different than leadership in government agencies and companies. Paper absorbed that academic leaders need to work closely with teaching, learning, research, and scholarship to bring out the best among academics. A literature survey is done on academic leadership in higher education (HE) and issues on freedom of academic, which shows the great importance and relevance in this context. The paper discusses the University Governance Architecture and New Education Policy (NEP) for leadership and effective governance in HEIs, the current scenario of higher education is undergoing a paradigm shift due to, among other factors, globalization, internationalization, cross border exchange of students and student mobility. The higher education literature suggests that alternative leadership styles are replacing the traditionally held definitions of leadership and provide new and different (and possibly superior) ways to understand leadership. This article looks for parallels within current leadership literature to see if community colleges administrators used the alternative language or emerging definitions of leadership to self-describe their own leadership Since education at all levels has become a key driver in economic and social development, universities must reorient their focus on the needs of society and the economy. Autonomy in governance and management in education has become the prerogative of higher education institutions and optimum allocation and use of resources have become one of the chief aims of all higher education institutions.


References

  • 1.   Bhushan, Sudhanshu (2016). Institutional Autonomy and Leadership. In N.V. Varghese and Garima Malik (eds.), India Higher Education Report 2015. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 412–27.
  • 2.   Breakwell, G. and Tytherleigh, M. (2008). The Characteristics, Roles and Selection of ViceChancellors. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
  • 3.   Broucker, Bruno, Kurt De Wit &Jef C. Verhoeven (2018). Higher education for public value: taking the debate beyond New Public Management. Higher Education Research & Development, 37:2, 227-240.
  • 4.   Chandra, Pankaj (2012). ‘Governance in Higher Education: A Contested Space: Making
  • 5.   The University Work’. Bangalore: Indian Institute of Management (Mimeo).
  • 6.   Kwiek, M. (2015). The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 43:77–89.
  • 7.   Magalhães, Antonio, AméliaVeiga, Alberto Amaral, Sofia Sousa and FilipaRibeiro. (2013). Governance of Governance in Higher Education: Practices and lessons drawn from the Portuguese case. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 295–311.
  • 8.   Malik, Garima (2017). ‘Governance and Management of Higher Education Institutions in India’. CPRHE Research Paper 5. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.
  • 9.   Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2020). National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi: Government of India.
  • 10.   All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) (2020). Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) New Delhi: Government of India.
  • 11.   Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2009). Report of the Committee to Advise on Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education. New Delhi: Gov-ernment of India.
  • 12.   National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA) (2020). NEP 2020: Implementation Strategies. New Delhi: NIEPA.
  • 13.   Ramsden, Paul (1998). Managing the Effective University. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), pp. 347–70.
  • 14.   Varghese, N.V. and Malik, G. (2019). Institutional autonomy and governance of higher education institutions in India. In Wan Chang Da, Molly N.N. and Loke, Hoe Yeong (eds.), The governance and management of universities in Asia: Global influences and local responses. New York, Routledge, pp. 43-55.
  • 15.   Varghese, N.V. and Garima Malik (2020). ‘Governance and Autonomy in Higher Education’. International Seminar Report, CPRHE/ NIEPA: New Delhi.
  • 16.   Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi (Self Study Report) (2020). Re-trieved from http://ignou.ac.in/userfiles/SSR%20Final.pdf
  • 17.   University Grants Commission (UGC) (2015): Annual Report (2014-15). New Delhi: UGC.
  • 18.   Varghese, N.V. (2014): The Diversification of Postsecondary Education. Paris: International Institute of Educational Planning /UNESCO.
  • 19.   Varghese, N.V. (2015): “Challenges of Massification of Higher Education in India”, CPRHE Research Papers 1. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, National University of Educational Planning and Administration.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Gedam. Kamalakar/Good Governance for Quality Higher Education/International Journal of Political Science 2023;9(1):17–23.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
November 09, 2022 December 20, 2022 June 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/IJOPS.2454.9371.9123.2

Keywords

High Education InstitutionGovernanceResearch ManagementHigh Education SystemAcademic ProfessionInternational Research Collaboration

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 22 September 2026, 13:42:30 (IST)


1338

Accesses

6
238
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received November 09, 2022
Accepted December 20, 2022
Published June 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share