Anamika Majumdar , Priyanka Patel1 , Anamika Majumdar2 , Rajnikant Vaghela3 , Komal Patel4 , Dhaval Patel5 , Chetana Damor6
Priyanka Patel, Anamika Majumdar, Rajnikant Vaghela, et al. Evaluation of Modified Biophysical Profile in Pre-Eclamptic Patients and Measure its Impact on Perinatal Outcome. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;8(4):221–225.
Introduction: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Modified biophysical profile (MBPP) combines Non stress test as a short term marker of fetal status and the amniotic fluid index as a marker of long term placental function which is easier to perform and less time consuming. Aim: To study the antepartum fetal surveillance with modified biophysical profile and perinatal outcome in pre-eclamptic women. Materials and Methods: Prospective descriptive study of perinatal outcome included 150 ANC patients gestational age between 34 to 40 weeks both primi gravida and multigravida with pre-eclampsia admitted in SMIMER hospital during January 2017 to June 2018. Patients were treated in line with standard protocol and perinatal outcome were then studied. Results: Of the 150 NST’s in MBPP, 77% were reactive and 23% were non-reactive. When the MBPP was abnormal with respect to both parameters 60% of the cases had LSCS and 40% of them had vaginal delivery. When both parameters were normal there were only 3.63% cases were MSL. When NST was abnormal and AFI normal 45.45% cases were MSL and when NST was normal and AFI abnormal 42.8% cases were MSL. When both the parameters were abnormal 63.6% of the cases had APGAR <7 `whereas when NST was normal and AFI was abnormal 2(28.5%) the cases had APGAR <7. When AFI was normal and NST was abnormal 36.3% of the cases had APGAR <7. Conclusions: Modified biophysical profile (MBPP) is easier, less time consuming, cost effective and patient compliant test.
No records found.
Priyanka Patel, Anamika Majumdar, Rajnikant Vaghela, et al. Evaluation of Modified Biophysical Profile in Pre-Eclamptic Patients and Measure its Impact on Perinatal Outcome. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;8(4):221–225.
| Received | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
Wednesday 17 June 2026, 23:27:55 (IST)
Download citation
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
| Received | N/A |
| Accepted | N/A |
| Published | N/A |