Ravindra Goswami Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Seth G.B. Podar College, Nawalgrah, Rajasthan, India
Seema Bhadauria Principal, Balwant Vidhyapeeth Rural Institute, Bichpuri, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
Address for correspondence: Ravindra Goswami, Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Seth G.B. Podar College, Nawalgrah, Rajasthan, India E-mail: goswami.raaj23@gmail.com
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
Ravindra Goswami, Seema Bhadauria. Chemical Deterioration of Marble Heritage Artifacts Induced by Microbial Activity: Mechanisms, Impacts, and Conservation Strategies. Ind. J Biol 2025; 12(2): 57-65.
Timeline
Received : September 19, 2025
Accepted : October 22, 2025
Published : December 25, 2025
Abstract
The preservation of marble heritage artifacts is increasingly challenged by microbial-induced chemical deterioration. Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and lichens secrete metabolic byproducts that chemically interact with marble’s calcium carbonate matrix, leading to structural and aesthetic degradation. This paper reviews the mechanisms of microbial-induced chemical deterioration, discusses the impacts on marble artifacts, and evaluates current conservation strategies. Marble, a widely used material in cultural heritage monuments, is highly susceptible to biodeterioration caused by microbial colonization. This study investigates the chemical deterioration of marble heritage artifacts induced by microbial activity, focusing on the metabolic byproducts of bacteria, fungi, and lichens. Field sampling and laboratory analysis revealed that microbial communities secrete organic acids (oxalic, citric, and gluconic acids) and sulfur compounds, which react with calcium carbonate (CaCO3), leading to the formation of calcium oxalates and gypsum. These reactions significantly increased surface porosity, discoloration, and micro-cracking. Results demonstrated that oxalic acid–producing fungi were the most aggressive agents of marble degradation, with calcium oxalate crystals reducing the structural density of samples by up to 28% compared to unaffected controls. Biofilm formation was also observed, enhancing moisture retention and pollutant deposition, thereby accelerating deterioration. Conservation treatments with natural biocides (essential oil extracts) showed a reduction of microbial colonization by 65%, while protective hydrophobic coatings decreased surface porosity and acid infiltration. This research highlights the urgent need for eco-friendly conservation strategies tailored to microbial-induced damage, ensuring the long-term preservation of marble heritage artifacts.
References
1. Yadav, S. (2025). Biodeterioration of cultural heritage monuments: A review of their deterioration mechanisms and conservation. Science of the Total Environment.
2. Cappitelli, F., et al. (2020). The control of cultural heritage microbial deterioration. Frontiers in Microbiology.
3. Santo, A. P., et al. (2023). Essential oils to contrast biodeterioration of the external marble of Florence Cathedral. Science of the Total Environment.
4. Pinna, D., et al. (2021). Microbial growth and its effects on inorganic heritage materials. In Microorganisms in the Deterioration and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Springer.
5. Scheerer, S., et al. (2012). Microbial deterioration of rocks and marble monuments of the Mediterranean Basin: A review. Environmental Microbiology Reports.
6. Caneva, G., Nugari, M. P., & Salvadori, O. (2008). Plant Biology for Cultural Heritage: Biodeterioration and Conservation. Getty Publications.
7. Cappitelli, F., & Sorlini, C. (2008). Microorganisms attack synthetic polymers in items representing our cultural heritage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(3), 564–569.
8. Dhami, N. K., Reddy, M. S., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Application of calcifying bacteria for remediation of stones and cultural heritages. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 304.
9. Gaylarde, C., & Morton, L. (2002). Deterioration of materials by microorganisms. In Hurst, C. J. et al. (Eds.), Manual of Environmental Microbiology (pp. 984–1001). ASM Press.
10. Gorbushina, A. A. (2007). Life on the rocks. Environmental Microbiology, 9(7), 1613–1631.
11. Marvasi, M., Mastromei, G., & Perito, B. (2020). Bacterial calcium carbonate mineralization in situ strategies for conservation of stone artworks. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1386.
12. Miller, A. Z., Dionísio, A., Sequeira Braga, M. A., & Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2012). Biodeterioration of stone: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 65(6), 727–746.
13. Sand, W. (1997). Microbial mechanisms of deterioration of inorganic substrates – A general mechanistic overview. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 40(2–4), 183–190.
14. Scheerer, S., Ortega-Morales, O., & Gaylarde, C. (2009). Microbial deterioration of stone monuments—An updated overview. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 66, 97–139.
15. Sterflinger, K. (2010). Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biology Reviews, 24(1–2), 47–55.
16. Sterflinger, K., & Piñar, G. (2013). Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art – tilting at windmills? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(22), 9637–9646.
17. Tiano, P. (2002). Stone biodeterioration: Research advances for conservation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone (pp. 1–11). Venice.
18. Warscheid, T., & Braams, J. (2000). Biodeterioration of stone: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 46(4), 343–368.
19. Bhatnagar, M. C., Jain, K. K., Bhatnagar, A., & Sharma, R. (2008). Microbial colonization and deterioration of Taj Mahal marble. Current Science, 94(12), 1722–1723.
20. Caneva, G., Nugari, M. P., & Salvadori, O. (2008). Plant Biology for Cultural Heritage: Biodeterioration and Conservation. Getty Publications.
21. Cappitelli, F., & Sorlini, C. (2008). Microorganisms attack synthetic polymers in items representing our cultural heritage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(3), 564–569.
22. Gorbushina, A. A. (2007). Life on the rocks. Environmental Microbiology, 9(7), 1613–1631.
23. Miller, A. Z., Dionísio, A., Sequeira Braga, M. A., & Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2012). Biodeterioration of stone: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 65(6), 727–746.
24. Sand, W. (1997). Microbial mechanisms of deterioration of inorganic substrates – A general mechanistic overview. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 40(2–4), 183–190.
25. Scheerer, S., Ortega-Morales, O., & Gaylarde, C. (2009). Microbial deterioration of stone monuments—An updated overview. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 66, 97–139.
26. Sterflinger, K. (2010). Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biology Reviews, 24(1–2), 47–55.
27. Sterflinger, K., & Piñar, G. (2013). Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art – tilting at windmills? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(22), 9637–9646.
28. Warscheid, T., & Braams, J. (2000). Biodeterioration of stone: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 46(4), 343–368.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Ravindra Goswami, Seema Bhadauria. Chemical Deterioration of Marble Heritage Artifacts Induced by Microbial Activity: Mechanisms, Impacts, and Conservation Strategies. Ind. J Biol 2025; 12(2): 57-65.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.