Abstract

Objectives: Forensic odontology believes that no two oral cavities are similar in characteristics. Bite marks are imprint of the dentition of a human or an animal on a pliable medium. Analysis of these help in narrowing down the list of suspects. Sources from which data was obtained: Various news reports and criminal journals (both containing cases from within the country as well as worldwide) Study Selection: There are many factors and grades that are used to evaluate the authenticity of a bite mark. Various methods of documentation and evaluation are used to produce a scientific testimony in the criminal investigations.Conclusion: Some experts believe that bite marks are only beneficial to eliminate suspects and cannot be relied as concrete evidence due to distortion caused by human skin and the subjective judgement with which it is evaluated.

• 1.   Mokokoma Mokhonoana, N for Nigger: Aphorisms for Grown Children and Childish Grownups, Goodreads, (Jan 14 2019).
• 2.   American Board of Forensic Odontology(ABFO),Standards and Guidelines for Evaluating Bitemarks, (March 16 2016).
• 3.   LJ Levine,Outline of Forensic Dentistry, Chicago Year Book Medical, pp 112-127, (1982).
• 4.   Dr. Gaurav Sharma et al, Bite Mark Analysis - An Important Tool in Crime Investigation, 28 JIAFM 69, pp-69-71, (2006).
• 5.   FD Wright, JC Dailey, Human bite marks in forensic dentistry, 45 Dent Clin North Am 365,pp- 365–97 (2001).
• 6.   DG MacDonald, Bite mark recognition and interpretation, 14 J. Foren.Sci. Soc 229, pp-229-233, (1974).
• 7.   ABFO, American Board of Forensic Odontology, Diplomates Reference Manual, (June-2010)
• 8.   Kapil Verma et al, Bite Marks as Physical Evidence from the Crime Scene-An Overview, 4 Journal of Bacteriology and Parasitology 181, (2012).
• 9.   GL Vale, Dentistry, bite marks and investigation of crime, 25 Journal of California Dental Association 29, pp 29-34, (1996).
• 10.   Sandeep Kaur et al, Analysis and Identification of Bite Marks in Forensic Casework, 12 Oral Health and Dental Management 127, pp 127-131, (2013).
• 11.   Dr Chidambaram Ramasamy, A Select List of International Cases Involving Forensic Odontology (49-2013 AD), Dental History Magazine Glasgow University,(2014).
• 12.   Wikipedia, Forensic Dentistry, n.d.
• 13.   Staff reporter, Jisha rape and murder case: Scientific evidence crucial for cops, Deccan Chronicle, (Jun 17 2016).
• 14.   Lata Misra, Man given life for rape and murder based on bite marks on victim, Mumbai Miror, (march 12 2015).
• 15.   T. Shamim et al, Human Bite Marks : The Tool Marks of the Oral Cavity, JIAFM 52, pp 52- 54,(2006).
• 16.   RD Rawson et al, Analysis of Photographic Distortion in Bite Marks: A Report of the Bite Mark Guidelines Committee, Journal of Forensic Sciences, (1986).
• 17.   B Kavitha et al; Limitations of Forensic Odontology, 1 Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 8, pp 8-10, (2009).
• 18.   Justin J McShane, Limitations of Forensic Odontology, The Truth About Forensic Science, (2011) h

Data Sharing Statement

Funding