This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
Rajan Kumar, Tanvi Yadav. An Analytical Study of Implementation of POCSO Act. 2012: In Special Reference to State of
Haryana. Int J Pol Sci 2024;10(2):108–115.
Timeline
Received : March 02, 2024
Accepted : August 17, 2024
Published : December 30, 2024
Abstract
A child is the most important asset of society and has a vital role to play in the development of nation. Children are the future of the country. The future of any country depends on how the children of that country are nurtured and nourished. But child sexual abuse is became threat to their development and development of the nation too. In India, Haryana is one of the state that highly in news because of child sexual abuse. However, Haryana is a progressing state economically but on the social front it is still backward and patriarchal. The Reflection of patriarchy and its effect on society at large are very evident in NCRB data. Moreover, the reported cases are much smaller than the actual number, because brining certain crimes into the notice of authorities will tarnish the image of victims. Though ‘The Protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012’ is strictly in action now, it possesses a lot of imperfections which challenges its effective implementation. This research article highlights the strengths of the act and at the same time, reflects the ethical and legal dilemmas we usually encounter in our day to day practice in Haryana.
References
1. AIR 1986 SC 1773
2. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly Resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989
3. Jyoti Belur and Brijesh Bahadur Singh, ‘Child sexual abuse and the law in India – A Commentary’ (2015) Crime Sci 4:26 accessed 2 December 2021; Pallavi Nautiyal and Arun Mal, ‘Towards Protection of Children against Sexual Abuse: No Child’s Play’ (2010) 3 NUJS L. Rev. 77.
4. POCSO ACT 2012, Section-2(d), child implies any individual under the age of eighteen years
5. ( 2017) 15 SCC 133.
6. Hanif Ur Rahman v State of Bihar, Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 160 of 2021 (Pat H.C.) (unreported).
7. Definition of PATRIARCHY. Merriam-Webster Dictionary
10. Sofia babu,’80% of Haryana’s sexual violence cases against Dalit women committed by upper caste men, reveals study, https://english.madhyamam.com/india/haryanas-eighty-percent-of-sexualviolence-cases-against-dalit-women-committed-by-upper-castemenreveals-study-608481
11. PRIA, Addressing Violence Against Dalit Women: Insights based on Field Experiences in Haryana,2013,https://www.pria. org/knowledge_resource/Addressing_Violence_Against_Dalit_ Women_2.pdf
12. National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India (2018), https:// ncrb.gov.in/en/crime-india-2018; Crime in India (2019), https:// ncrb.gov.in/hi/node/2974
13. G.C. Pal, Caste–Gender Intersectionality and Atrocities in Haryana: Emerging Patterns and State Responses (2018), https:// journals.sagepub. com/doi/full/10.1177/2394481118774476
14. Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression, Speak: The Truth is still alive! Land, Caste and Sexual Violence against Dalit women and girls in Haryana (2014), https://wssnet. org/2014/07/18/land-caste-and-sexual-violence-against-dalitgirls-and-women-in-haryana-a-report-by-wss/
15. National Family Health Survey IV-India, 2016, http://rchiips.org/ NFHS/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf
16. Arumugam Servai v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 6 SCC 405.
17. All India Dalit Mahila Adhikar Manch (AIDMAM), Voices Against Caste Impunity; Narratives of Dalit Women in India (2018)
18. 2019 Latest Caselaw 1161 SC
19. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 2(d).
20. Arhant Janardan Sunatkari v State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 136
21. Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Implementation of the POCSO Act, 2012 by Special Courts: Challenges and Issues (National Printing Press, Bengaluru, February 2018).
23. Sabari v Inspector of Police, 2019 (3) MLJ Crl 110.
24. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013,Section 166A
25. Code of Criminal Procedure Code 1973, Section 154(2)
26. See Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression, Speak: The Truth is still alive! Land, Caste and Sexual Violence against Dalit women and girls in Haryana (2014), available at https://wssnet. org/2014/07/18/land-caste-and-sexual-violence-against-dalit-girlsand-women-in-haryana-a-report-by-wss/
27. Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
28. Office of the Chief Minister of Haryana, Press Release, 10 January 2020, https://haryanacmoffice.gov.in/index.php/10-january-2020
29. See Nirvirkar Jassal, Gender, Law Enforcement, and Access to Justice: Evidence from All-Women Police Stations in India, American Political Science Review, 11 August 2020.
30. Human Rights Watch, Everyone Blames Me: Barriers to Justice and Support Services for Sexual Assault Survivors in India (2017), https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/11/08/everyone-blames-me/barriersjustice-and-support-services-sexual-assault-survivors
31. Mahender Chawla &Ors. v Union of India &Ors. [Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2016].
33. Human Rights Watch, Everyone Blames Me: Barriers to Justice and Support Services for Sexual Assault Survivors in India (2017), https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/11/08/everyone-blames-me/barriers-justice-and-support-services-sexualassault-survivors
34. Code of Criminal Procedure, 197, Section 173
35. Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, Section 309
36. The POCSO Act 2012,Section 35
37. Sakshi v Union of India 2004 Supp(2) SCR 723
38. Nipun Saxena v. Union of India, W.P. (c) No. 565/2012, Order dated 11 May 2018
39. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Nirbhaya Fund, 29 November 2019, https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare. aspx?PRID=1594221
40. Ministry of Women and Child Development, One Stop Centre Scheme: Implementation Guidelines for State Governments/UT Administrations, December 2017, https://wcd. nic.in/sites/default/files/OSC_G.pdf
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Rajan Kumar, Tanvi Yadav. An Analytical Study of Implementation of POCSO Act. 2012: In Special Reference to State of
Haryana. Int J Pol Sci 2024;10(2):108–115.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.