Abstract

The intersection of accounting principles and national education policy presents a critical area of inquiry in the evolving landscape of educational governance and financial management. This study investigates the relationship between accounting practices and the goals, strategies, and implementation mechanisms outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP). Drawing upon a comprehensive literature review and empirical analysis, the study examines how accounting frameworks influence resource allocation, financial transparency, and accountability mechanisms within the education sector. Additionally, it explores the extent to which the NEP integrates accounting principles to enhance efficiency, equity, and quality in educational outcomes. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between accounting systems and educational policy frameworks, offering insights for policymakers, educators, and practitioners to optimize resource utilization and governance structures in support of national education objectives.

• 1.   All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) (2020). Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) New Delhi: Government of India.
• 2.   Ball, S. J. (2003). Fear of the teacher’s soul and efficiency. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215- 228.
• 3.   Chapman, J. (2010). Accounting for quality: The teacher’s role in assessment and evaluation systems. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 255-271.
• 4.   Deller, F., Otley, D., and Broadbent, J. (2006). The role of performance indicators in performance formulation and legitimacy. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 341-366.
• 5.   Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Transformation. Teachers College Press.
• 6.   Hopwood, A.G. (1972). An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 156-182.
• 7.   Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi (Self Study Report) (2020). Tried again from http://ignou.ac.in/userfiles/SSR%20Final.pdf
• 8.   Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Implications for students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
• 9.   Meyer, H.D., and Rowan, B. (2006). Organizational conditions that affect teachers’ workplace decisions. D.R. Gitomer and C.A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527-576). American Educational Research Association.
• 10.   Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2009). Report of the Advisory Committee on Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education. New Delhi: Government of India.
• 11.   Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structure of Organizations: A Synthesis of Research. Prentice-Hall.
• 12.   National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA) (2020). NEP 2020: Implementation Strategy. New Delhi: NIEPA.
• 13.   Perera, S., and Harrison, G. (2012). The Impact of Management Accounting Practices on the Quality of Decisions: Evidence from Sri Lankan Organizations. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(2), 1-20.
• 14.   Ramsden, Paul (1998). Effective University Management. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), pp. 347–70.
• 15.   Spillane, J.P., Camburn, E., and Pareja, A.S. (2010). Taking a distributed perspective on teachers’ work: An introduction. Teachers College Record, 112(10), 2445-2453.
• 16.   University Grants Commission (UGC) (2015): Annual Report (2014-15). New Delhi: UGC.
• 17.   Varghese, N.V. (2014): Diversification of PostSecondary Education. Paris: International Institute of Educational Planning/UNESCO.
• 18.   Varghese, NV. and Garima Malik (2020). ‘Governance and Autonomy in Higher Education’. International Seminar Report, CPRHE/NIEPA: New Delhi.
• 19.   www.education.nic.in
• 20.   www.indiatoday.in
• 21.   www.researchgate.net
• 22.   www.scholar.google.com
• 23.   www.shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in
• 24.   www.shodhgangotri.inflibnet.ac.in
• 25.   www.ugc.ac.in
• 26.   www.wikipedia.com

Data Sharing Statement

Funding