Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior

Democracies without protests are a dictatorship. In democracies, the
state must not only facilitate the dissent but should develop a culture
of constructive dissent, protest, and opposition. The Right to protest
has constitutional protection but its application should be used in
a manner not to trespass on another right. The judiciary must play a
constructive role by providing a harmonious construction approach in
case of conflict between the two rights. Once right cannot and should
not have predominance over another. However, the dissent shall not be
a disorder, and the difference between the two needs to be protected.
It’s in this backdrop the paper is an attempt to analyze the position
and the judgment given in the above-stated case concerningthe right to
protest and the role of the apex court in the same. The paper will suggest some suggestions in the backdrop of judgment.
Keywords: Protest; Constutional culture; Judicial balancing; Pressure
tactics.
 

In 1956 John McCarthy implemented Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the first time. AI is considered a tool for coping with extremely complex problems which cannot be solved through direct equations or statistical techniques. AI could be used for calculating differential and integral equations, electrical circuit theories, logical mathematics, and areas of gaming. Using the same strategy, AI has been included in law enforcement, where it can function as a statistical analysis that can efficiently anticipate and deter crimes. Law enforcement, has gradually turned to artificial intelligence to increase smart policing approaches. AI is said to be a critical element in law and it will help and promote efficiency in certain ways. The primary aim of law enforcement is to prosecute crimes by including a social aspect of protection and security, AI may be used in several forms to accomplish such targets. This article aims at reviewing the use of AI by law enforcement to tackle criminal activities. Keywords: Smart policing; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Crime Investigation.

The term “screen time” is used to refer to activities like watching
television, working or playing on computer, playing video games
or spending a lot of time on smart phones. Screen time is termed as a
sedentary activity wherein a person remains physically inactive and
a less amount of energy is utilized. Psychological well-being means
the feeling that life is moving well. It is a combined notion of feeling
worthy and functioning well. Too much of screen time is said to have
a negative effect in adolescents like insomnia, attention problems,
anxiety, depression and also physical issues like obesity. The current
study focusses on the influence of screen time on the psychological wellbeing of adolescents. A correlation of Coefficient was used to find the influence of screen time on the psychological well-being of adolescents. A sample of 200 adolescents between age range of 12-17years is taken under this study. The scale PGI General Well-being Measure developed by Dr. Santosh K. Verma and Ms. Anita Verma was used to measure the psychological well-being of adolescents. The screen time of the participants varied from 2-3 hours a day to more than 4 hours a day. The results showed a negative correlation of coefficient between screen time and psychological well-being.
Keywords: Screen time; Psychological Well-being; Adolescents.