Introduction: Antifungal agents such as 1% Clotrimazole can be included in maxillofacial prostheses for their antifungal properties. Despite a lack of literature evidence supporting this connection, we conducted this study to assess and compare the physical properties of vulcanized maxillofacial silicone material with and without the inclusion of 1% Clotrimazole as an antifungal agent.
Material and Method: Custom stainless steel molds were produced to assess mechanical properties (Tensile Strength, Elongation Percentage, Tear Strength, and Hardness). Three dies, compliant with ISO and ASTM standards, were crafted for silicone test specimens. To ensure even dispersion, 1% Clotrimazole, an antifungal agent, was added to part B of room temperature vulcanized maxillofacial silicone material (VST-30, Versiltal silicone).
Results: Regardless of whether room temperature vulcanized maxillofacial silicone material included 1% Clotrimazole as an antifungal agent, all specimens displayed statistically insignificant changes in mechanical properties, including Tensile Strength, Elongation Percentage at break, and Tear Strength. However, a notable difference in Hardness was observed in the maxillofacial silicone material when comparing samples with and without 1% Clotrimazole. Samples with the antifungal agent exhibited improved mechanical properties (Tensile Strength, Elongation Percentage at break, Tear Strength, and Hardness) compared to those without the antifungal agent.
Conclusion: Adding an antifungal agent to maxillofacial silicone elastomer is a viable option to enhance prostheses by reducing fungal activity. Additionally, it improves the mechanical properties (Tensile Strength, Elongation Percentage at break, Tear Strength, and Hardness) of medical-grade maxillofacial silicone material, extending the longevity of the prosthesis.
Original Article
English
P. 79-88