Abstract

The increasing number of malpractice allegations against Indian allopathic doctors has led to a growing need for medicolegal assistance. Medical Defence Unions (MDUs) play a crucial role in providing support to doctors facing such allegations. In the evolving medical landscape, allopathic doctors in India increasingly face the daunting challenge of malpractice allegations. The Medical Defence Union (MDU), a non-profit organization originating in the United Kingdom, has a long-standing history of providing medicolegal assistance to healthcare professionals. This research article explores the potential application of the MDU’s model to the Indian context, focusing on the type of support it provides and its impact on doctors’ professional lives. The paper discusses the similarities and differences between the medico-legal climates of the UK and India, the significance of professional indemnity, and the psychological impact of malpractice claims on doctors. The findings suggest that a structure similar to the MDU in India could offer substantial support to Indian allopathic doctors, mitigating the legal and emotional challenges associated with malpractice allegations. It examines the medicolegal assistance provided by MDUs to Indian allopathic doctors, highlighting the benefits, challenges, and future directions. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, case studies, and expert opinions, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the role of MDUs in supporting doctors in medicolegal issues.

• 1.   “Medical Defence Unions: A Review” (Journal of Medical Ethics, 2020).
• 2.   “Medical defence”. BMJ. 1 (6077): 1615–1616. 25 June 1977.
• 3.   The Case of Dr. David Bradley. Br Med J 1885;1:403.
• 4.   Medical Defence Union. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.themdu.com/.
• 5.   Medical Defence Union (MDU). (2022). The Member Guide. Retrieved from https://www. themdu.com/about-the-mdu/membershipguide.
• 6.   Behrens, R. (2009). The MDU and the role of medical defence organizations. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(1), 20-25.
• 7.   Sarkar, S. (2017). Medico-legal issues in India: Past, present, and future. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2(2), 87-91.
• 8.   Prasad, R., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019). Understanding the legal landscape of medical malpractice in India. The National Medical Journal of India, 32(5), 271-275.
• 9.   Shah, S. (2020). Professional indemnity and its significance for Indian doctors. The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 3(4), 251-254.
• 10.   Chopra, A., & Bhatt, M. (2021). The rising tide of medical malpractice claims in India: An analysis. The Lancet India, 3(10), 123-127.
• 11.   Cottrell, Elizabeth; Stanley, Andrew (2009). The Medical Student Career Handbook. Radcliffe Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84619-304-0.
• 12.   Madan, R; Das, Nileswar; Patley, Rahul; Nagpal, Neeraj; Malik, Yogender; Math, Suresh B. Consequences of medical negligence and litigations on health care providers – A narrative review. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 66(4):p 317- 325, April 2024.
• 13.   Doctors being investigated after an unexpected death need more support, says MDU. BMJ 2018;362:k3303.
• 14.   Muacevic, A. The Imbalance in Medico-Legal Cover Awareness and Uptake Between Overseas Junior Doctors and Local Graduates in the NHS. Cureus. 2021 Feb; 13(2): e13336.
• 15.   Vries DH, Paul, Sanderson, Barbara, Janta, et al. International comparison of ten medical regulatory systems. Egypt, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Nigeria, Pakistan, Poland, South Africa and Spain. [Aug;2019]; Link last accessed on 18thAug, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/ technical_reports/TR691.html RAND. 2009.
• 16.   Case examples - The MDU Link last accessed on 18thAug, 2024. https://www.themdu.com/ about-mdu/fair-compensation/case-examples.
• 17.   Madan, R; Das, Nileswar; Patley, Rahul; Nagpal, Neeraj; Malik, Yogender; Math, Suresh B. Consequences of medical negligence and litigations on health care providers – A narrative review. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 66(4):p 317- 325, April 2024.
• 18.   James RI, Manoj D, Johnson LR, Karunya PE, David, SNJ. A 10 year Review of Judgments on Alleged Medical Negligence Cases by the Supreme Court of India.J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2024 June; 46 (1-Suppl).
• 19.   Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 2019.
• 20.   General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK. Websitelast accessed on 18thAug, 2024:https:// www.gmc-uk.org/.
• 21.   National Medical Commission (NMC) Act, 2019. Websitelast accessed on 18thAug, 2024:https:// www.nmc.org.in/.
• 22.   Medicos Legal Action Group (MLAG) Chandigarh; Website last accessed on 18th Aug, 2024:http://www.mlag.in.
• 23.   Indian Medico Legal and Ethics Association (IMLEA) Website last accessed on 18th Aug, 2024:https://imlea-india.org/.
• 24.   Institute of Medicine & Law (IML)Website last accessed on 18th Aug, 2024: https://imlindia. com/.
• 25.   Tomkins, Christine; Purshouse, Craig; Heywood, Rob; Miola, José; Cave, Emma; Devaney, Sarah. “Should doctors tackling COVID-19 be immune from negligence liability claims?”. 1st July 2020, BMJ. 370 (370): m2487.
• 26.   Gallagher, Thomas H. Responding to Medical Errors — Implementing the Modern Ethical Paradigm: N Engl J Med 2024;390:193-197.
• 27.   Indian Journal of Legal Medicine (IJLM), Redflower Publications.Website last accessed on 18th Aug, 2024:https://rfppl.co.in/about_ journal.php?jid=191

Data Sharing Statement

Funding