Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume  5, Issue 3 (Supplement), Jul-Sep 2017, Pages 285-285
 

Original Article

Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Awareness of Permanent Method of Family Planning

Nishita Shettian, Disha Ajila

Nishita Shettian Assistant professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, A.J.Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. Disha Ajila Post Graduate, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, A.J. institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI:

Abstract

Background: Among developing countries, India holds the second place in being the most populated country accounting to 1.23 billion. This issue addresses the need for effective population control by implementing various family planning and contraceptive services thereby improving the quality of life. Permanent method of family planning referred to tubectomy (tubal ligation) in women either by mini laparotomy or by laparoscopic sterilization and vasectomy (vas deferens ligation) in males. Our study aims at assessing the factors influencing the awareness and acceptance of permanent method of family planning. Materials and Methods: This is a questionnaire based prospective survey carried out in A.J. institute of Medical Sciences on 300 postpartum women after they have undergone two or more child births. Results: 77.3% of women were aware of the available family planning services out of which 64.3% had knowledge about permanent method of sterilization. 73% preferred to undergo tubectomy whereas only 13.7% were willing for vasectomy with the main reason for refusal being fear of surgery (25.9%). 32.6% of women wanted their husbands to undergo vasectomy rather than having a tubectomy themselves. Desire for more children (39%) was the main reason given by most women who refused to undergo tubectomy. Conclusion: Though women were aware of contraceptive practices, proper knowledge about permanent methods of family planning was still inadequate especially regarding vasectomy. Male participation plays a key role in decision making and acceptance of permanent family planning methods. Our study showed that lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of adverse effects, fear of sexual dysfunction, culture and religious beliefs, opposition from the male partner and health concerns were the factors influencing tubectomy acceptance over vasectomy as a method of permanent method of sterilization.