Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Cancer Education and Research

Volume  11, Issue 2, July-December 2023, Pages 15-19
 

Original Article

Assessment of Difference in Planning Target Volume Margins and Deviation in Lateral, Longitudinal, Vertical Axis using Thermoplastic Pelvic Cast versus Knee Rest During Immobilization for Computed Tomography in Patients with Cervical Cancer

Somya Sharma, Pragati Kesharwani , Saloni Singhal , Ashar Iqbal Lodi, Amresh Kumar , Virendra bhandari

1,2,3 Resident, 4,5 Assistant Professor, 6Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College & Institute, Indore 453555, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijcer.2321.9815.11223.2

Abstract

Aim: To identify the most reproducible technique of patient positioning and immobilization in patients with carcinoma cervix.

Background: Radiotherapy aims at controlled killing of tumors cells without harming the normal tissue surrounding the disease. The basic aim of radiotherapy planning is to ensure adequate coverage of target with the planned dose and to save the normal tissue. Adequate margins for setup errors are necessary, the margins applied must not be huge as that would adversely affect normal tissue. This study compares the knee rest with thermoplastic pelvic cast in patients with carcinoma cervix with an aim of identifying the most reproducible method.

Material and methods: Cross-sectional study was done in patients of carcinoma cervix undergoing radiotherapy from April 2021 to June 2022 at our institution. Immobilization was performed on 20 patients (Thermoplastic pelvic cast i.e., Pelvic cast pelvic masks=10, Kneerest=10). The systemic error, random error and planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated for both the techniques and statistically analysed.

Result: The systemic error in lateral (x-axis), longitudinal (y-axis) and vertical (z-axis) in thermoplastic pelvic cast and knee rest are 0.61cm, 0.39cm, 0.15cm and 0.17cm, 0.4cm, 0.32cm respectively. Random error are lateral (x-axis), longitudinal (y-axis), and vertical (z-axis) are 0.07cm, 0.63cm, 0.08cm and 0.10cm, 0.44cm, 0.22cm. CTV-PTV margin using van herk’s formula in lateral (x-axis), longitudinal (y-axis) and vertical axis (z-axis) using thermoplastic pelvic cast and knee rest are 1.59cm, 1.44cm, 0.44cm and 0.49cm, 1.31cm, 0.96cm respectively. CTV-PTV margin using Stroom’s formula in lateral (x-axis), longitudinal (y-axis) and vertical axis (z-axis) using thermoplastic pelvic cast and knee rest are 1.28cm, 1.24cm, 0.36cm and 0.41cm, 1.11cm, 0.80cm respectively.

Conclusion: Among the two techniques, knee rest technique is least time consuming and most economically viable in developing countries.

 


Keywords : Immobilization device, Knee rest; Error, Planning target volume.
Corresponding Author : Virendra bhandari, Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College & Institute, Indore 453555, Madhya Pradesh, India.