Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  4, Issue 4, Oct-Dec 2017, Pages 1046-1050
 

Original Article

A Study of Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia as an Adjuvant to Lignocaine

P. Venkateswarlu1, K. Niranjan2

1Assistant Professor 2Post Graduate Student, Department of Anesthesiology, SVS Medical College, Mehbubnagar, Telangana 509001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4417.22

Abstract

Context: Dexmedetomidine has been a prime matter of subject studies in research over it with its comparison with various other agents as it possesses properties like sedation and analgesia. Aims: To study the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in intravenous regional anesthesia. Settings and Design: This is a prospective, randomized, double blind control study conducted at SVS Hospital and Medical College, Mahabubnagar. Methods and Material: In this study totally 60 patients were divided into two groups. We gave 40 ml of Lignocaine with 0.5 microgram/kg Dexmedetomidine in Group LD patients. 40 ml of 0.5% Lignocaine was given for Group L patients. Statistical Analysis: Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis. P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of pulse rate, age, duration of surgery, weight, and mean arterial blood pressure. Sensory onset time, motor onset time was significantly lesser in LD group compared to L group. At the same time, motor recovery time and sensory recovery time were significantly more in LD group compared to L group (p<0.05). Duration of post operative analgesia when VAS was more than 3 was significantly more in LD group compared to L group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was found to be very effective in terms of less occurrence of pain of tourniquet, quick onset of motor and sensory blockade, hemodynamic stability, persistence of analgesia post operatively.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Lignocaine; Benefits; Anesthesia; Analgesia; Intravenous. 
Corresponding Author : P. Venkateswarlu, Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, SVS Medical College, Mehbubnagar, Telangana 509001, India.