Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  3, Issue 3, Sep-Dec 2016, Pages 199-205
 

Original Article

Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Sedation and Post-operative Analgesia with Spinal Anesthesia

Ganorkar Prachi D.*, Dalvi Naina**, Tendolkar Bharati***

*Ex-resident, Department of Anesthesiology, ***Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia, LTMMC & LTMGH, Sion, Mumbai. **Additional Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesia, HBTMC & Dr R N Cooper Hospital, Juhu Mumbai 400 056.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.3316.1

Abstract

 Background: Central neuraxial anaesthesia may need to be supplemented with benzodiazapines, alpha2 blockers etc. for sedation and analgesia. In the present study, we compared the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam on sedation, postoperative analgesia, and spinal block duration in lower abdominal surgeries like inguinal hernias and appendicectomies performed under spinal anaesthesia. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled double blind study was carried out in 60 patients. Group D (n=30) received IV premedication with Dexmedetomidine 0.5mcg/kg while Group M (n=30) received IV Midazolam 0.05mg/kg fifteen minutes prior to subarachnoid block with bupivacaine 0.5% 3.5ml. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, level of sedation, cardiorespiratory parameters and quality of postoperative analgesia were recorded. Results: The duration of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in group D (280.00 ± 31.62 minutes) as compared to group M (263.00 ± 30.30 minutes) (p<0.05). The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group D (261.50 ± 90.85minutes) than group M (213.67 ± 49.02minutes). The sedation scores were higher in group D as compared to group M in the beginning but comparable later on. The pulse rate was significantly decreased in group D than in group M. The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures were significantly decreased in group M. There was no significant difference in respiratory rates in both the groups. Conclusion: IV premedication with dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg prolongs the duration of sensory blockade as compared to IV midazolam 0.05 mg/kg. Dexmedetomidine produces sedation with easy arousability, and provides better analgesia than midazolam.

Keywords: DexmedetoMidine; Midazolam; Premedication; Sedation; Spinal Anesthesia.


Corresponding Author : Ganorkar Prachi D.*