Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Communicable Diseases

Volume  10, Issue 1, January - June 2024, Pages 07-11
 

Original Article

Environmental Risk Analysis for Unintentional Childhood Injuries in a Rural Area of Delhi, India

Bratati Banerjee

Professor, Department of Community
Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar
Marg 110002, New Delhi, India.
 

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijcd.2395.6631.10124.1

Abstract

Unintentional childhood injuries cause high mortality and disability. Objective of this crosssectional study, conducted in two villages of Delhi, India, wasto assess risk of unintentional childhood injuries. Study population included adolescents and adult women of selected families. Data was collected by interview of the subjects and observation of domestic and peri-domestic environment, covering 121 houses, which included 299 adolescents and 164 women.
Knowledge of the subjects regarding injuries and their prevention was assessed as Mean Subject Knowledge Score, which for the total population was 3.60 (15% of total score). Mean Family Practice Scoreas reported by subjects were 11.50 (38% of total score) and 10.60 (35% of  total score) regarding injury prevention and injury treatment seeking behavior respectively. Mean environmental safety score was 19.95 (49.8% of total score).  Mean knowledge score was 3.58 for adolescents and 5.00 for women. The difference was not statistically significant. Mean score regarding family practices for prevention of injuries was 13.45 for adolescents and 10.03 for women, with statistically significant difference. Mean score regarding injury treatment seeking behavior did not show any difference. Families under study are at high risk of unintentional childhood injuries, as knowledge of subjects and family practices regarding injury prevention and injury treatment seeking behaviorare poor, along with low environment safety score
 


Keywords : Unintentional Childhood Injuries; Injury Prevention; Environmental Safety.
Corresponding Author : Bratati Banerjee,