Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volume  9, Issue 2, April – June 2023, Pages 93-97
 

Original Article

Comparison of Norepinephrine & Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management for Septic Shock

Madhav Navlekar1 , Harshil Mehta2

1Associate Professor, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Science, Bhuj, Kutch-370001, Gujarat, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijem.2395.311X.9223.2

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a clinical syndrome that has physiologic, biologic, and biochemical abnormalities caused by a dysregulated inflammatory response to infection. The present study aimed to estimate the dose of injection of norepinephrine in micrograms/ kg/min after 12 hours of starting the vasopressor infusion to keep an MAP of above 65 mm Hg.

Materials & Method: The study was done for the period of two years. Patients who were 18 years and above; who were diagnosed with septic shock during their ICU course and whose relatives gave informed written consent were included in the study.

Result: Total of 12 patients were lost during the study period and so in total 100 patients were enrolled for the study. Both the groups were comparable with respect to the MAP (p = 0.655). The norepinephrine dose in group I vs group II at 12 hours was found to be 0.163 ± 0.089 vs 0.396 ± 0.18 μg/kg/min (p <0.001). Reduction in blood lactate concentration in 12 hours was significantly higher in group I [1.479 ± 1.46] than group II [0.08 ± 1.50] mmol/L (p = 0.002). Increase in the urine output of the patients in 12 hours in Group I [0.72 ± 0.44] than group II [0.47 ± 0.460] mL/kg/hour (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: A low-dose continuous infusion of terlipressin may have a significant role in ensuring better organ perfusion, preventing renal injury, and improving the SOFA score of the patients when used in adjunct to norepinephrine, early in the management of septic shock.


Keywords : Norepinephrine; Terlipressin; Septic shock.
Corresponding Author : Harshil Mehta