Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology

Volume  1, Issue 1, January - March 2008, Pages 11-13
 

Review Article

Doctor and Law

Dr. T.K.K. Naidu

Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences Nagunoor, Karimnagar – 505 417 (A.P.)

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI:

Abstract

Abstract

After the Consumer Protection Act. 1986, came into effect, a number of patients have filed cases against doctors. This article presents a summary of legal decisions related to medial negligence, what constitutes negligence in civil and criminal law and what is required prove it. Public awareness of medical negligence in India is growing. Hospital managements are increasingly facing complaints regarding the facilities, standards of professional competence and the appropriateness of their therapeutic and diagnostic methods. After the Consumer Protection Act. 1986, has come into force some patients have filed legal cases against doctors, have established that the doctors were negligent in their medical service and have claimed and received compensation. As a result, a number of legal decisions have been made on what constitutes negligence and what is required to prove it.
 


Corresponding Author : T.K.K. Naidu