Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Cancer Education and Research

Volume  6, Issue 2, Jul-Dec 2018, Pages 125-134
 

Original Article

Response to Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Survival in AML: A Single Centre Experience from North India

Anshul Gupta1, Akanksha Garg2, Akhilesh Sharma3, Ashish Mishra4, Sanjeev5, Soniya Nityanand6

1Assistant Professor 2DM Student 3Tachnicain Grade-1 4Tachnicain Grade-1 5Assistant Professo 6Professor & Head, Department of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226014, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijcer.2321.9815.6218.2

Abstract

  Aim: The present study was carried out to analyze the  various patient related (e.g. age, sex, performance status), disease related (white blood cell count, cytogenetic and molecular mutational status)and treatment related (delay in treatment initiation and response to induction chemotherapy)variables as predictors of outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients presenting to a tertiary care center in North India. Materials and Methods: Thedata of all newly diagnosed de-novo AML patients who presented to our center from January 2015 to December 2017 and opted for chemotherapy was correlated with treatment outcome. Results: Sixty eight patients underwent induction chemotherapy during the study period. Sixteen (23.5%), 49 (72.1%) and 3 (4.4%) were in the favorable, intermediate and adverse risk groups, respectively. Fifteen (22%), 8 (11.7%) and 11 (16.1%) patients were positive for AML-ETO, NPM1, FLT3 mutations (3 patients had FLT3 D835 mutations), respectively. Exon 17 c-kit mutations were seen in 10 (14.7%) patients. We did not observe any exon 8 c-kit mutations in our cohort of patients. Biallelic CEBPA mutations were seen in 6 patients (8.8%). Following induction chemotherapy, 26 (38.2%) patients attained complete remission (CR), 20 (29.4%) achieved incomplete CR (platelet count<100 x 109/L) and 22 (32.4%) were refractory to induction therapy. There were only 3 (4.4%)  induction deaths.High TLC was associated with FLT3 mutations (p=0.03) and presence of extra medullary disease correlated with AML-ETO (p=0.02) and c-KIT mutations (p=0.02). There was statistically significant correlation of FLT3-ITD mutation positive patients with risk of relapse (p= 0.001). The 2 yr Overall survival (OS) and Event free survival (EFS) were 39.6% and 22.8%,
respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the performance 
status (PS) and post induction remission status independently predicted survival.

Conclusion: Thus our data highlights that PS and post induction remission status translates into better OS. 

Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia; Induction Chemotherapy; Molecular Mutations; Prognosis, Survival.
  


Corresponding Author : Soniya Nityanand, Professor & Head, Department of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rae Bareli Road. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226014, India.