Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 2, February 2018, Pages 168-172
 

Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Nerve Stimulation and Ultrasound Guidance for Popliteal Block: A Randomized Double Blinded Study

Radhakrishnan A.1, Iswaryarajan Hercule2

1Associate Professor 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Hospital, Ariyur, Pondicherry 605102, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5218.3

Abstract

Introduction: Popliteal block is one of the rarely performed regional anaesthetic techniques because it requires great expertise in anatomical land marks and is often very technically challenging. Recent introduction of ultrasound technique for nerve blocks has gained popularity when comparing to the standard nerve stimulation technique. In this study, we have compared the success rate, duration of block procedureand complications between nerve stimulation and ultra sound guidance of popliteal block. Methods: 120 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive the block using either the nerve stimulation (n = 60) or the ultra sound technique (n = 60). Ropivacaine 0.25% (30 mL)was injected for both the groups. Results: Duration of the block procedure and block failure rate were significantly higher in nerve stimulation technique than the ultra sound technique (P value < 0.05). There were no differences in onset and duration of block between two techniques. The nerve stimulation guidance was associated with significant incidence of vascular puncture (13.3%) but ultrasound technique was safer with nil incidence of vascular puncture. Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance technique was better in lesser block procedure time and a good success rate (P value < 0.05) and was safer, with no incidence of vascular puncture.

 


Keywords : Nerve Stimulation; Popliteal Block; Ropivacaine; Ultra Sound.
Corresponding Author : Iswaryarajan Hercule, Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Hospital, Ariyur, Pondicherry 605102, India.