Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  2, Issue 2, Jul-Dec 2015, Pages 73-77
 

Original Article

Caudal Epidural Analgesia in Children: A Comparison Between 0.2% Ropivacaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine

Archana Tripathi*, Naval Meena**, Mukesh Somvanshi***

Professor*, Postgraduate Student**, Associate Professor***, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Govt. Medical College and AG Hospitals, Kota (Rajasthan), India Cor

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.2215.2

Abstract

Background: One of the most commonly used anaesthetic procedure in paediatric surgeries is the caudal epidural block. The aim of present study was to compare the effectiveness, duration of analgesia and motor block after a single dose caudal epidural block with either ropivacaine or bupivacaine in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgery. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, sixty children, American Society Association Grade I-II, aged between 1 yr and 6 yr of both sex undergoing infraumbilical surgeries were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 30 children each to receive a caudal block with either 1 ml/kg, 0.2% ropivacaine (Group R) or 1 ml/kg, 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B). Standard anaesthesia induction was conducted in all children. After induction, caudal epidural block was performed in lateral position. By the end of surgery, reversal of muscle relaxation was done and children were extubated. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters were noted. Postoperatively, pain score, duration of analgesia, requirement of rescue analgesia and degree of motor blockade were recorded. Results: No significant differences in demographic data as well as duration of surgery were recorded. Haemodynamics were not different in two groups. Postoperative pain score, duration of analgesia and requirement for rescue analgesic were comparable in two groups. However, degree of motor block was significantly less in ropivacaine group. Conclusion: Caudal ropivacaine provides effective analgesia comparable to bupivacaine and as ropivacaine possessing less motor blockade makes it a suitable agent for caudal epidural block in children.

Keywords: Caudal Block; Postoperative Analgesia; Ropivacaine; Bupivacaine.

Corresponding Author : Naval Meena**