Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  8, Issue 2, March-April 2021, Pages 157-158
 

Editorial

Ethical considerations during the Peer review process

Pallavi Ahluwalia

Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI:

Abstract

Peer review is the expert evaluation of scientific articles. Peer review validates scientific research and aids in the improvement of published manuscript quality. The main ethical concern is preventing erroneous and unsustainable findings from being published, which could mislead future research. Reviewers are encouraged to follow ethical guidelines throughout the peer review process, just as authors do before, during, and after writing a research paper, as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).


Keywords : Peer-review, Evaluation, Scientific research, Quality, Ethical, Guidelines, COPE.